Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Looks like a deal has been struck between 7 Dems and 7 GOP Senators:
Under the agreement, Democrats would pledge not to filibuster any of Bush’s future appeals court or Supreme Court nominees except in “extraordinary circumstances.”
For their part, Republicans agreed not to support an attempt to strip Democrats of their right to block votes.
Kos quotes McCain as saying:
You have before you the agreement and I won’t go in the details of it. But basically, all 14 of us have pledged to vote for cloture for the judicial nominees Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor and Priscilla Owen.
The signatories make no commitment to vote for or against cloture on two judges, William Myers and Henry Saad. Future nominations will – the signatories will exercise their responsibilities and the nominees should only be filibusters under extraordinary circumstances.
Kos goes on to say:
Now, some wanted to roll the dice, but had we lost, Dobson would’ve chosen the next Supreme Court justice. I wasn’t willing to make that bet, and I’m glad we didn’t have to.
On top of everything, Frist looks weak. He’s failed his crazies. He’s finished.
Things may change, but so far, this is the second-best option. Beating Frist on the procedural vote may’ve been the best option. But the worst option was too horrible to contemplate.
To some extent, he’s right - losing the filibuster would have been pretty damn bad. But the alternative, allowing Owens and Brown to get the nod - is not really a victory as far as I’m concerned. I fought hard against these nominees myself - calling and writing Kerry and Kennedy (not that you have to worry about Kennedy) and doing the actions that came across my desk via pro-choice and other activist groups. These two, especially Owens, are especially nasty pills to swallow.
It’s so sad that our choices are reduced to between having the Senate rules nuked, and letting the worst of the worst of Bush’s nominees get lifetime appointments to the Appellate Court.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.389 seconds
May 24th, 2005 at 10:07 am
Sad indeed. But let’s face it: Bush is President, and the GOP has 55 votes in the Senate. It’s only through the procedural quirk of the cloture rule that Dems had any hope at all of stopping any Bush nominees, as long as the GOP was willing to march in lockstep with him. This is obviously a far-from-perfect scenario, but considering the numbers on Capitol Hill, ending up with a Majority Leader with egg all over his face is not too bad an outcome. The real work is the 2006 elections, which to me are starting to look a tad brighter.
May 24th, 2005 at 11:46 am
Let’s hope. I’m as keen on winning ‘06 as anyone!
Which Senator is up for reelection in NH? Any chance of dethroning Sununu? Pleeeeeeease? Living as close as I do to the NH border (and being from NH) I would happily spend time volunteering for a candidate that could win against that guy. Wouldn’t mind seeing Gregg go either…
Hey, we got a Dem elected as governor there, why not Senator?
May 24th, 2005 at 12:41 pm
Neither. Sununu is up again in ‘08. Gregg was just re-elected in ‘04.
May 24th, 2005 at 1:23 pm
Well, then, I’m getting ready for ‘08!
May 25th, 2005 at 1:14 am
Though it won’t affect the Senate, you could always work for a NH house seat.