Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

January 15, 2006

Julian Steele Re-Re-Re-Invention

by at 7:37 am.

It was disappointing, to say the least, to read that the Julian Steele project latest developer may no longer be interested. In a few months, it will be 3 years since the City of Lowell tore down the low-income housing complex located on Gorham Street near the Chelmsford town line. As we know, the plan is to build a mix of market value and affordable housing.

Every time I drive by the empty fenced-in lot, I remember the emotionally-charged debates that took place throughout the city, especially during public hearings in the City Council chambers, prior to the vote to tear down the existing structures.

Promises were made to housing advocates during those heated public discussions. Those promises must be kept. If not, then it is time for those heated debates to begin again.

3 Responses to “Julian Steele Re-Re-Re-Invention”

  1. K-R-S Says:

    This situation is awful & just getting worse by the day.
    How can this situation be so MISmanaged?
    I wonder if, it wa EVER the intent of the first three developers to EVER buikd any affordable units over there?
    Perhaps, they figured if they dragged their feet long enough, the city and state would just say, ”
    Oh, go ahead, do what you have to do..” (eliminating the afordable units..)
    Now, I was surprised to find that this was to be a mix..so they took away “X” amount of affordable housing units and replaced it
    with far less affordable housing.
    Granted, I was glad to see that the area was to be reinvented. The facilites were an eyesore. However, you can’t get away from the fact that
    it was a home to many many families. Irrespective of where they were relocated.
    I beleive it was Waittil..that had suggested a type of community housing plan..having to do with keeping living costs stable
    over a long period of time..Perhaps he will weigh in later on this..

  2. waittilnextyr Says:

    The plan I mentioned earlier was based on leasing the land upon which the to-be purchased housing was built. Much of the escalation of housing prices is due to supply/demand rather than building costs (although building costs are increasing). I don’t know who the owner of the Julian Steele property is, but I suspect it is a public entity. Therefore, as K-R-S is suggesting, that may be a good candidate for a community housing plan.

    The sale price would be the cost of the housing (with some profit for the builder), and there would be a lease cost for the land, likely a nominal fee that would be sufficient to maintain the common property. In addition, there would be a restriction on the property, where a re-sale would be regulated to prevent speculative purchases of the housing, and the long term affordability of the housing would be retained.

    I don’t know of such a plan in practice, but I would agree that Julian Steele would be a good candidate for a demonstration project.

  3. waittilnextyr Says:

    It didn’t take too long to find some information on the concept mentioned above. Take a look:

    http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/pub-detail.asp?id=1011

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

If you are not on Twitter and want to follow our feed on Facebook, click "Like" for our FB page.
follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

January 2006
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

LiL Fundraising for Elizabeth Warren!

Goal Thermometer

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

42 queries. 0.357 seconds