Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

February 5, 2006

Promises, Promises

by at 9:40 pm.

Oh boy, are the city councilors going to start really hating this blog (more than they do). Because commenter waittilnextyear posted a list of actions (or outright promises) made to the voters during the elections, including stuff from their own literature:

A list of actions for the city council, some of which are from their literature in last election:

1. Control Property Taxes
2. Expand Commercial Tax Base
3. Put 180 Units of Affordable Housing on-line at Julian Steele
4. Close an Acceptable Deal for Hamilton Canal Properties
5. Put 900-car Parking Garage on-line on Middlesex St.
6. Initiate Private Development in accordance with the JAM plan
7. Initiate Private Development at the Hamilton Canal Properties
8. Close Loopholes in Zoning Code to Avoid Neighborhood Exploitation
9. Eliminate “Appearance” of Conflict of Interest on Local Boards
10. Facilitate the Private Development of Next Phase of Mass Mills
11. Create Significant Development Opportunity on Post Office Site
12. Get Courthouse project underway, without taking liability for another parking garage (consider JAM area instead of E. Merrimack St.)
13. Maintain Full Funding for School System
14. Establish Enforceable Contracts for New School Construction Projects
15. Create Plan for Mixed Rate Affordable Housing
16. Support UTECs efforts to Find New Home
17. Improve Traffic Flow and Eliminate Bottlenecks and Safety Hazards Citywide
18. Bring jobs to the city
19. Make connection between educational institutions and new jobs
20. Provide more opportunities for the city’s youth
21. Reduce crime, particularly gang activity

What sort of ticker should I create so we can keep track of whether or not they follow through on this list? Perhaps something like a fundraising bat? Or maybe a pie chart with each promise listed and filled in when fulfilled? I know some of you out there still have the actual literature from the campaigns…so let’s come up with an actual list of promises made on TV, radio, and print (post them in comments) and we’ll hold their feet to the fire for the next two years using witty graphics and an ongoing series of posts.

2 Responses to “Promises, Promises”

  1. Tim Little Says:

    Off the top of my head (and following the Super Bowl, fwiw):

    Good idea, but I would keep it simple: Score each council member A to F on each campaign promise made.

    To be fair, I think you have to give each council member his/her own scorecard. I think it would also be wise to provide a Factcheck.org-like analysis (tho maybe not so in depth) to provide some context for each promise made (e.g., if some ninny Governor decides to roll back the state income tax rate to 5%, obviously this is going to have ramifications for property taxes)

    Ah, nothing like holding our elected officials accountable. Come to think of it, how about doing the same for Senator P. and the local reps? A lot of work, but it could yield interesting reults….

  2. waittilnextyr Says:

    Item 7 (Hamilton Canal Development) was acted on at the council meeting last night. There were 6 councilors proactive in moving the issue, and 3 reluctant due to concerns on the cost risk of eminent domain land acquisition.

    In comments last Fall, I noted that the value of 300 spaces in the parking garage (1/3rd the cost of the garage plus maintenance and operation) and the risk of environmental clean-up were too high a price to pay for the land. With back-taxes owed, it may make sense to explore taking the land by tax title, rather than eminent domain.

    Whereas the investment in that area by the city should make the future value of the property increase, it would be ironic if that investment caused the city (us) to pay a much higher amount in any eminent domain court settlement.

    As time goes on the property valuation should increase, and therefore the taxes assessed on the property. Either the city receives those taxes, or obtains the land by tax title.

    In this process, either the city obtains the land in lieu of taxes, or the owner recognizes he must sell or develop the land in order to make economic sense with the tazes he is paying.

    The city would avoid additional cost and cost risk, but could forfeit control on the type of development that the owner may find most economically viable. Does the city have a stated policy on what they would choose to go there? If not, they forfeit nothing.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

February 2006
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 0.734 seconds