Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

September 29, 2006

Misleading Headline

by at 3:11 pm.

If you read today’s Sun banner headline, “Lowell Schools Top Area Fail List,” you might be left with the impression that Matt Murphy, the writer of the accompanying story, focused on how bad Lowell schools are compared to the other schools in the area. The subheading (in smaller font) of the Sun article, “Lower-achieving student groups put city districts at disadvantage” is a better reflection of the content of the article.

Murphy was reporting on the latest MCAS scores and the Department of Education’s belief that these scores are reflective of the problems unique to urban school like Lowell. “Poverty and Limited English proficiency rank among the biggest risk factors for students struggling to meet rising state academic standards in urban school districts like Lowell…” That is how Murphy’s article begins.

Yes, it is true that 22 of the 36 schools in the area that did not make Yearly Adequate Progress (YAP) are Lowell schools but the story was the progress the School District, the plans in place to move forward and the obstacles facing urban schools such as Lowell. The article left with the impression that we as a School District are moving forward.

Yesterday’s Boston Globe leading article was on the same issue. Their banner headline read, “A crucial leap in MCAS” and the sub-headline was “10th Graders in poor cities raise rankings.” The Globe article focused on the improvement made by three of the 10 poorest school districts: Boston, Brockton and yes, Lowell.

I know that Lowell schools, especially its administration, have received a lot of criticism these past few weeks, some of it warranted and some not, but to put that kind of negative spin on the headline is misleading.

7 Responses to “Misleading Headline”

  1. Marigold Says:

    Amen to this observation! The Sun seems incapable of reporting good news in Lowell schools.

  2. waittilnextyr Says:

    As usual, the headline banner is not by the writer, but the editor. It is a reflection of his current campaign against the school administration. Criticism may be valid, but reinterpretation of the articles is a license he should not have.

  3. Joe Says:

    As an eighth grade English teacher, it frustrates me that
    > the media doesn’t question the MCAS numbers more. Driscoll
    > is in denial. He mentions that the tenth grade scores are
    > improving, but fails to mention that those numbers do not
    > include drop-outs. In Lowell, for example, where I teach,
    > many of the students who pull down our eighth grade scores
    > (and give us the most discipline problems), drop out of
    > Lowell High (or the Voke). Many do so in their freshman
    > year (although they can’t officially until they’re 16).
    > Other students are held back in ninth grade and also don’t
    > show up as tenth grade test takers.
    >
    > I don’t think there has been enough attention to this
    > matter. In reality, the tenth grade failing rates should
    > include all those students who have dropped out across the
    > state, because you can’t pass the MCAS if you’re not in
    > school. And if they have dropped out, isn’t that a
    > failure? Why doesn’t anyone question Driscoll on this when
    > he makes it seem like the tenth graders are doing better
    > than all the rest?
    >
    > If we had that many kids drop out of the middle schools,
    > we would have better test scores too! I’m not trying to
    > make excuses, but I think the public has the right to know
    > the truth. There’s a huge disparity between the freshman
    > class and the graduating class every year at Lowell High.
    > I believe they lose over 400 students. I know everyone
    > is trying their best to keep kids in school, but to say
    > tenth graders are doing better than elementary and middle
    > school students is also misleading.

  4. Lynne Says:

    Nice call, Mimi, great post!

    I won’t mention names as to who I’m guessing made the decision to use a totally misleading, attacking headline for the article in such a way…but seriously, this is tiresome. Anyone wonder why the Sun is becoming irrelevant these days?

    Keep the reporters, most of them are good (underpaid) people. But I question the economic decision of the owners of the paper to allow such agenda-pushers to be in charge of the paper. A paper is supposed to report the news, not create agendas.

  5. I81U812 Says:

    Ya think the Sun is gunnin’ for the Superintendent?

  6. K-R-S Says:

    I81…No! Ya’ think?

  7. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    Not entirely on topic but in Monday’s paper was their annual statement of circulation. The Sun continues to lose readers! They are down to 42,194 paid papers published a day! That includes all the papers that are distributed to other communities so the number of readers in Lowell is even smaller although they don’t break it down.

    So I guess my question is if the Sun can’t turn it’s own house around, and they have been in the newspaper business for over a hundred years, then why would anyone listen to them when they suggest ways to run the city?

    I remember the days when they used to include the circulation number in the banner above the headline, if memory serves me it was over 96,000 back then and Greater Lowell had fewer residents!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

If you are not on Twitter and want to follow our feed on Facebook, click "Like" for our FB page.
follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

September 2006
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

LiL Fundraising for Elizabeth Warren!

Goal Thermometer

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

42 queries. 0.694 seconds