Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
As we know, Lowell is losing its Police Superintendent, Ed Davis, to the City of Boston. But it was Lowell School Superintendent, Dr. Karla Brooks Baehr who has been for the past few week, the subject of discussion in the local media and political circles.
Last Wednesday, by a vote of 6- 1, the Lowell School Committee went behind close doors and held an executive session to decide whether to discipline the Superintendent. The decision to discuss the Superintendent’s performance was triggered by a few high profile incidents in the Lowell public schools.
There was dissatisfaction with the school superintendent’s reponses; both in style and content. This past Sunday, the Lowell Sun Column commented on the discussion that took place behind close doors. By the way, why have executive session meeting if you are going to selectively leak information to the local paper?
The Column states “Baehr was told to be more active in the community, and more vigilant and timely in keeping the committee abreast of issues. And she was told she will be held accountable for the schools’ academic successes and failures.” Communication and Accountability; nothing wrong with that request.
However the “be more active in community” thing is a bit nebulous. So in an effort to help Dr. Baehr understand what some Lowellians mean when they say community activism, LiL is offering these suggestions:
1. When you are referred to as Dr. Karla Brooks Baehr, you need to say, “Please call me Karla.” You see it is Bernie, Marty, Pangy. Two syllable name, no surname and definitely no title.
2. Have your staff participate in the Human Dog Sled race during this year’s Winter Fest. You need to be their honorary captain. If you can get one or two assistants to participate, not just clerical staff, that would really help.
3. Season tickets to the Lowell Spinners.
4. Attend one or two social functions a month to make sure Nancy Tuttle gets your name in the paper.
5. Breakfast at the Owl Dinner and/or Aperitifs at Café Paradiso
6. Take up golf hoping that next year Jim Campanini asks you to be part of the Lowell Sun foursome at a charity event.
7. Change your scheduled appearances on WCAP’s morning show from once every 3 months to once a month.
8. Shop at the Route 38 Market Basket. Yes, we know it is located in neighboring Tewksbury but that is a just a technicality.
9. Canal clean-up; October 28.
10. And of course, start posting on LiL
Good luck, Karla!
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.738 seconds
October 24th, 2006 at 9:27 am
A “Top Ten” worthy of Letterman!
October 24th, 2006 at 9:36 am
Love #6 Mimi! The visual on that is hilarious!
October 24th, 2006 at 12:31 pm
Interesting call in today’s Sun editorial for a Public Safety commissioner. Thoughts?
October 24th, 2006 at 8:02 pm
Yeah, look under “Davis goes to Boston”
October 25th, 2006 at 12:25 am
A public safety commissioner is a BAD idea. I’d like to see the so called examples where it has worked well. I work in public safety and I don’t know of any. I still haven’t figured what stopping crime and fire/rescue work have to do with each other. Maybe the new city manager justs want to bring in some outside people and this is the excuse.
By the way great list.
October 25th, 2006 at 8:30 am
I think this is the Sun’s proposal, not Lynch’s.
October 27th, 2006 at 5:05 pm
Speaking of The Sun I’d like to note somewhere (and felt this to be a good place) they are censoring what gets posted on the community forum. Seems if you disagree with Jim Campanini or point out the inconsistencies in his arguments, such as I chose to, its a no go for your post. How about a little freedom of speech from our so called champions in the third estate?
October 27th, 2006 at 5:50 pm
I’m not kidding about this at all, but within a hour of my above post my message from three days prior suddenly appeared on the Sun Community Forum, inserted between two posts I had read earlier. I am not a conspiracy theorist by any means, so it must be a huge coincidence in timing. At any rate thanks for allowing me to post freely (and instantly) here. I’m fairly new to this blog, but I think its insightful and a great forum.
Smokey
October 29th, 2006 at 5:29 pm
Welcome Smokey
October 29th, 2006 at 5:56 pm
Smokey: In defense of the Sun’s blog (and I don’t defend it lightly)…the Sun, as a (sometimes) professional publication should, I think, throw all comments of any web forum associated with it into some sort of moderation, whether that’s full moderation or just forcing people to sign up for a username with a valid email address, etc. After all, there’s spam (especially x-rated spam) that you do NOT want to have connected with your publication, and then there’s the occasional total jerk who comes on to swear at people, or say, pretend to be someone else. Having gone through that annoyance recently and in the past, I can honestly say I can’t blame them. However, I have never known anyone to have their comment not approved even with disagreeing with Campanini (trust me, I did it often). The comment ends up approved eventually, and Campanini usually does respond. Granted, I feel his responses often completely miss the mark anyways, and I also feel that that blog is a waste of my time and I don’t bother to comment there, or even much read it. After the first couple of months it was obvious to me that quite often, the posts were either super-irrelevant (about horses? it’s a political forum!) or else full of analysis which was completely out of left field with no evidence to back it. I got tired of refuting the obvious.
But it’s perfectly within the right of any owner of any blog to moderate the conversation, as I have done in the past. The Sun is just more strict about having to look at every comment before approving it (I do not, I get too many in a day and I have a business to run!), and it’s likely that the Sun is just too busy/understaffed to bother with being timely about it either. The blog is obviously not a priority of the editorial staff given how much time passes between some posts.
Your complaint posted here might have been read by someone who can approve comments at the Sun’s blog, and triggered them to spend the time to log in and approve it, that’s all. I wouldn’t read too much into it.