Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Everyone wants a piece of the pie now that Patrick and Murray won the corner office. Susan of Beyond 495 reminds us that the pie took a lot of hard work, and not everyone brought their best ingredients to the table. Or brought anything at all.
Democrats are famous for the circular firing squad and pulling defeat from the jaws of victory. I hope this is not really such a commentary. But I would like to be frank about what did and did not happen in Lowell when it came to winning the election this year. It’s probably unwise and I’m sure some of my friends would recommend against it, but I’ve never been one to back down from saying something true because the truth might sting a few people a little.
The fact is, is that the local Democratic establishment, what is left of it (which isn’t much), largely stood by after the primary while we did the hard work. Oh sure, they showed up to the big gatherings, the kickoff parties and the day the candidates came to Lowell. And some volunteered their resources so we could phone bank and have an office. All commendable.
And the Lowell region had lots of help from volunteers who supported other candidates in the primary, workhorses all, both rookie and veteran. I know how hard it must have been when their candidate didn’t win, how disappointing, but they came anyway to help elect the ticket. And we had quite a lot of help from some local elected politicians from City Councilor on up to US Representative, and whose staff were instrumental to the effort, on their own time and because they wanted to win.
But the people whose names are on local Democratic committee chairmanships, who’ve taken on the responsibility for leadership in the party in our city? Where have they been all these years? Where are the voter registration tables, the outreach to the diverse groups who live in the city? Where were they when we ran phone banks or planned our events? What have they been doing to build a party which is based on involvement and participation? The “machine” is ratty now, a pale imitation of a working committee. But hey, Democrats get elected in this city and state anyway, right? What’s the point of trying to earn the votes of the people. They’re stuck with us, so why bother?
If someone out there is reading this and thinks it’s about them, you should try and work out why you have such a guilty conscience. Or, you could just get irked at me for writing it. After all, we are just the worker bees you seem to believe you don’t need. Sure, we’ve been welcomed…sometimes, not always…at the rare occasional meetings. But it’s so very hard to do the work without strong leadership. Frankly, we don’t want to do it without you. But we did, and we will. Revitalizing the party, and keeping it in tune with the city and its residents, is damned hard work.
And someone has to get it done.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.503 seconds
November 29th, 2006 at 5:50 pm
Sometimes I think that what keeps people back in large projects is that they get stuck in a day-to-day mode and never look to doing something greater. They don’t have any ambitious plans that could work great or falter; it’s too hard to put a lot of work together in general, but on a new and ambitious plan?
Part of the reason why I got so excited about Deval is the fact that I see some sort of visionary leadership. He not just looking toward the day to day running of the state, but actually wants to do something ambitious: start projects - or even ideas - that go beyond day to day operations. Some of them may fail - in fact, some probably will - but we’re damned if we don’t try and we may come up with something really brilliant that does great things for our state.
It’s nice that we have Deval doing this, but he’s only one person. We need literally hundreds of new leaders who aren’t just concerned with the day to day stuff - we need true leaders, true visionaries, people who will shake things up and try something new - try something additional. We need these people at the local party apparatus; we need these people on Beacon Hill; we need these people everywhere.
November 29th, 2006 at 5:59 pm
Good points, Ryan. Education will be the key, as it is not one great idea that we need, but an endless succession of good/great ideas to keep ahead of the game.
November 29th, 2006 at 8:43 pm
You know, what you’re describing is even worse in the smaller towns. I read Susan’s comments and nodded my head. In my town, we basically had three people working on the campaign, the local town coordinator, one other person, and me. I won’t say what county I’m in, but I think ours was poorly run compared to the others. I know our county coordinator was calling our town coordinator and getting on his back like it was his fault, but what could we do? Even in a smaller town, it’s hard to identify voters when you have three people calling the entire voter list. We had to organize around work and school, which meant a lot of the time we’d have to call when most people were not going to be home and just leave messages. We finally managed to find one volunteer in our town, only problem is she’d already called the campaign and they sent her to volunteer in another town.
None of the local power people would help. The sad part is, they weren’t for other candidates, they were for Deval, but if they were doing anything it was for other races. We’d ask for help and people would agree and then not show up, they’d take call lists and then return them the day before the primary totally uncalled. I know people are busy, but they couldn’t let us know they weren’t going to be able to do it in advance so we could try to get it done ourselves? It wasn’t a secret that we didn’t exactly have a lot of help. I don’t know what the answer is, but I’m concerned that it’s going to be even harder to find help next time as people get complacent about how well the campaign went even though they know they could have done a lot more personally.
November 30th, 2006 at 6:39 pm
Thanks Ryan, for your comment, and I think you’re on to something.
Zama, sorry it went down like that.
The people who might feel guilty reading my post are not bad people. I do think some of them are more interested in title than doing the work, but I suppose that’s natural. It’s fun being in the in-crowd! But it does get in the way of the rest of us trying to do good in the world.
When I was president of an amature orchestra back in NH, I took on a LOT of work. In fact, I was the hardest working person on the 9-member board. If something didn’t happen - a concert programme was not printed, or the books of that year’s adbook wasn’t at the location we needed them to be - I was responsible. Granted, I was only president a year and that level of involvement is hard to keep up for decades (an argument for stepping the hell aside if there’s a good replacement) but I did what needed to get done, to advance the goals of the organization.