Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

February 27, 2007

City Council Meeting 2/27/07

by at 6:08 pm.

Tonight’s City Council meeting has only one City Council Motion but it is an extremely important one. CC Jim Milinazzo is requesting that the proposed State Senate legislation on “Cable Competition and Choice for Consumers” be discussed in a meeting of the Cable/Comcast Sub-Committee.

The legislation “would enable companies seeking to offer cable television to get approval from the state rather than cities and towns.”

In January, on LiL we discussed the possible introduction of this legislation which is being called by some circles as the Verizon bill. There was a lively discussion and most of it centered around municipalities losing control, threat to local access television and the impact it will have on net neutrality.

As I had said previously, I am in favor a discussion that will lead to true cable choices but I do not want the City to lose control either. Adding to the mix is Congressional activity on this subject. Today’s edition of the Boston Globe reports that U.S. Rep Ed Markey, Chairman of the House Sub-Commitee on Telecommunications and the Internet will begin hearings that will “focus on fostering competition that will benefit consumers.”

So, I look forward to the Lowell City Council Cable/Comcast Sub-Committee hearing on the subject.

Tonight, the LTC issue will be raised again. Last Wednesday, when the Board of Directors met, they approved the City’s proposed guidelines regarding appropriate programming; they also accepted the resignation of one of their own, Tom Wirtanen. He has filed a petition asking the City “Council serve Non-Renewal Notice to LTC. “ In effect he is asking the City Council to terminate the contract with LTC. You can watch the video of last Wednesday meeting on the LTC web site and hear Mr. Wirtanen’s comments which led to his resignation and his appearance tonight in Council chambers..

By the way, the streaming video listing of all the municipal meetings is updated and they appear to be back on track.

5 Responses to “City Council Meeting 2/27/07”

  1. Paul@01852 Says:

    At last night’s Council meeting there was confusion about when to schedule the next Cable Subcommittee meeting due to SC conflicts. I became distracted briefly and did not catch when the next meeting was scheduled. Could you (or someone) please post if/when you know when the meeting will be held? It sounds like a meeting I’d like to attend if possible.

  2. Shawn Says:

    One example you may want to keep an eye on is the total p***ing contest going on between Verizon and Dracut regarding a telephone pole that Dracut feels is in an unsafe location but Verizon refuses to move.

    Its at the point where although I like the idea of competition and easing the process of getting other companies into our state to compete with Comcast.. I question it if the only benefactor is Verizon.

  3. Lynne Says:

    Ug, Verizon is terrible here too. Half the time when they have a pole request or something at that portion of the CC meeting, no one even shows up. They never do what they promise until asked a million times.

    I hate Verizon, having had more than a few run-ins with their terriblec customer service both as a residential and a commercial customer. It’s one more reason I won’t switch to Verizon wireless, and am seriously considering ridding ourselves of a land line altogether, or switching to a VOIP.

  4. Mimi Says:

    Paul:

    The City Clerk has not yet posted the date and time of the Cable/Comcast meeting on the Events Calendar.

    http://www.lowellevents.info/cgi-bin/calendar.pl?calendar=city

    It is going to be a long meeting with two important topics on the agenda.

  5. Felicia Says:

    Folks should just keep in mind that this “cable competition” bill is really about taking control and assignment of public rights of way (our streets, waterways, etc) out of the hands of local governments and into the hands of the state. Instead of our locally represented government deciding what compensation we should receive for the use of these rights of way, the state will decide for us. What Lowell needs is very different than what Dracut needs than what Northhampton etc . . .

    Franchising remains the only locally controlled means of accessing huge telecomm infrastructure. Why would we want to risk loosing money, communication bandwith, specifc consumer discounts that meet our community needs, the ability to define what type of “video services” we receive so that a company like Verizon has an easier time making a profit.

    I’m not convinced consumers will get all that much of a price break, but they certainly will lose a place at the table.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

February 2007
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 0.638 seconds