Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Everyone wants to berate bloggers for being anonymous or unaccountable (we are accountable, but that’s for another post) or operating in pajamas (I’m not, actually). But who in their right mind believes anything that is said on WCAP anymore?
The local radio station is absolutely famous for live smearing, lying, innuendo-based rumor-spreading. Once upon a time, the morning talk show host (a local, er, discelebrity) focused his eye on this blog and me, calling me as bad or as extreme (I can’t quote exactly, because WCAP isn’t the sort of legitimate operation that records or archives what crosses its microphones…I wonder why?) as Hitler, David Duke and the KKK, and…horrifically…NAMBLA. It only stopped when I pointed out that they were driving my traffic up, or when George got bored, or both. A couple weeks ago, he was ranting crazy about Western Ave Studios because…get this…artists here were engaging in the long time-honored tradition of *gasp!!!* painting nudes. NUDE ART!!! IN LOWELL!!! Save the children, by God!
But it doesn’t end there. Dick Howe caught a “breaking news story” on WCAP this morning where news director Gary Francis (did you get that? news director) “led the 7:30 a.m. news with a report he attributed to ‘political insiders’ that Eileen Donoghue ‘may’ drop out of the Congressional race within the next seven days.” Which, it turns out, is patently false according to all factual sources (like, say, Donoghue herself, who is officially announcing her candidacy today). Of course, WCAP doesn’t corroborate their story first, or call the person in question to get their side, they just put it out there. Even the Sun can (mostly) manage that much in their news.
I’ve pretty much ignored WCAP. Frankly, I have a risk of high blood pressure along with my PKD, and I honestly don’t think they’re worth my time, anyway. But they seem to want to be taken seriously on the local political scene. I don’t think they realize that no one does take them seriously. Even their frequent guests are forced to resign themselves to being on the air there because, first, when faced in person with those they love to berate, they calm the hell down at least while they’re there; and second, because local venues are few and far between and at least you can get your message out. People that I know who listen? They want to keep track of the stupid things said on WCAP. Better to know it so you can fight it. I admire their courage and their bravery.
Is that the sort of brand they wanted to build over there? One of laughable credibility, slanderous (I’m guessing it’s a matter of time before they’re sued) accusations and stories, and of course, an agenda that’s obvious to the rest of us but which they think is hidden? And in between, some of the most inane conversation this side of the Connecticut River. I will never forget the time I turned on WCAP in the afternoon, and they were talking about farting on airplanes. And that’s one of the more classier segments I’ve heard aired.
Look, I am finding out first hand how hard it is to produce jabber over the airwaves. I am considered in some circles to be a talker; at least my mother constantly says so. And all I have to fill is a 20 minute time slot every Friday, finding one set of guests per week, and yeah, it’s damned hard. (Especially on a volunteer basis.) However, I strive for some level of professionalism, despite the fact I didn’t know thing #1 about radio before last fall. I feel a responsibility for what I say on this blog and on the air. WCAP is an institution, for sure, but I honestly don’t understand where they come off pretending to be legitimate. Not in their local live talk, and certainly not in their syndicated schedule, which features Michael Savage, a worse bigot and liar than Don Imus ever was. (By the way, their site advertises that they have Air America host Jerry Springer on every weekday morning from 10 to noon, but that must be totally outdated because that’s not what’s on there now and it’s almost 11am. Instead, I was accosted by some nationally-syndicated jerk citing some study about Jews. And because the study says Jews are smarter then gentiles this host must think it’s OK, despite the fact this study came from the same guy who wrote a book about how black Africans are less smart genetically than whites. Uh huh.)
That’s WCAP in a nutshell. Like with Don Imus, a little light of day shining on these people wouldn’t be a bad thing. I might just take on the task. Stay tuned.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.385 seconds
April 12th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
WCAP owes to Eileen and her supporters (me) to let us know which sitting Lowell City Council member made that call this morning. I can tell you who it was not, because I just saw a four of them at Eileen’s enthusiasitc campaign rally.
To do this to her on the day she officially announces her candidacy is Lowell politics at its worst.
April 12th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
Not even I am narcassistic enough to listen to that kind of vile crap. Oh noes, nude art!
April 12th, 2007 at 3:58 pm
I’d think you could narrow the field down to 3 pretty quickly.
April 12th, 2007 at 7:32 pm
Since we are talking about “screwing up”, why is it that Barry Finegold’s name is repeatedly mispelled on this blog?
April 12th, 2007 at 8:09 pm
Lowellian: We apologize to State Rep. Finegold. I quickly checked and the spelling error occurred twice; I would not characterize that as repeatedly. Nevertheless, we should not misspell people’s name, not even once.
April 12th, 2007 at 8:25 pm
Lowellian: they may have thought there were two Finegolds in the race. The one who is quoted in the Boston Globe this morning…
“State Representative Barry Finegold of Andover said the voters are interested in issues not endorsements. “This campaign needs to be about healthcare, education, and the environment, not who endorses who,” Finegold said.”
And the one who sent out a press release hours after the Sheriff ended his campaign touting the endorsements of many of DiPaola’s supporters just the night before.
April 12th, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Well also check out the link to Finegold’s website at the top of this page…..I just think all candidates (whether for Congress or City Council) should be covered equally and fairly. I don’t think it fair to discount the undeniably shoddy reporting on WCAP and then to credit those same shoddy reporters when they attribute some “rumor” to a City Council opponent. And, worse, to take that “rumor” and expand upon it by accusing 3 City Councilors…..I have no preferred candidate for Congress, but over the past few days and weeks, I have heard “rumors” about just about every candidate supposedly getting out of this race.
April 12th, 2007 at 9:07 pm
Are you seriously equating the gravity of a misspelling to the gravity of reporting false campaign news? As things that are worth critisizing, are these two things even in the same timezone?
April 12th, 2007 at 9:58 pm
No. I am not….As a totally separate issue, I am pointing out that reporting unsubstantiated rumors occurs here too. Unsubstantiated rumors that originated with the same shoddy reporters are expanded upon here and, even further, specifically directed at 3 City Councilors.
April 12th, 2007 at 10:51 pm
Don’t throw around the unsubstantiated rumors charge without examples and links.
April 13th, 2007 at 12:01 am
It’s a relatively simple point. I can explain it again to you (for the third time) but I can’t help you understand. The unstabstantiated rumors I refer to are: #1) the rumor the Donoghue was getting out of the race for Congess; #2) the rumor that a member of the City Council started the rumor that Donoghue was getting out of the race….It was fairly pointed out that the rumor #1 should have been verified before it was reported. By the same token, rumor #2 ought to be verified before accusations are thrown around. If the rumor #1 originally reported on WCAP (that Donoghue was getting out of the race) is irresponsibly reported and not credible, then how, in the next breath, can anybody believe and, in fact, expand upon and begin speculating as to a specific group of 3 councilors? Is it because YOU LIKE rumor #2 but not rumor #1? If it is a rumor or story or allegation that you like, you run with it. But if it is a rumor or story or allegation that you don’t like, you pull out the penalty flag and cry fowl.
April 13th, 2007 at 7:42 am
Lowellian;
I would direct you to richardhowe’s blog, http://richardhowe.com/; he has a post with the entire transcript of what was said yesterday morning on WCAP. It was clearly stated, and I heard it myself:
“George: Gary, why did you start this?
Gary: It came from a very highly placed source.
John: Namely?
Gary: Another member of the [Lowell city] council.”
Later on that morning, I was in attendance when CC Donoghue announced her candidacy. I saw CCs Jim Milinazo, George Ramirez, Kevin Broderick and Mayor Bill Martin enthusiastically clapping and wearing an Eileen Donoghue for Congress sticker. So, I think it is fair to assume that the phone call did not come from one of them.
Not the unfair part, is that according to WCAP only one person was the source of that rumor; the other three remaining CCs did not. I would think that CC Donoghue’s colleagues who did not make that call to WCAP, out of common courtesy, have already contacted her.
April 13th, 2007 at 11:41 am
Well, gee, Lowellian, what are we supposed to think? As Mimi said, Gary as much as admitted it came from another Councilor on the radio. What I am critisizing here is that said “news” reporter (ha!) did not question the motives of said City Councilor or corroborate the story or even call Donoghue to get her side. If he lied about where he got that info, that’s even WORSE, but since it was indicated that Gary was the primary source (I wouldn’t be surprised if he wasn’t but took credit for it anyway, or seemed to), it’s fair to say you can speculate who it might be by looking at who it definitely isn’t.
But I have heard corroborating evidence that it did come from another city councilor, so this is all moot anyway.
Actually, I can expect Donoghue to get a boost from this whole debacle with a lot of people in the city. They are reminded that Donoghue was instrumental in ousting the Cox GOB.
And Lowellian, find the links and the actual text before you accuse me of rumor mongering. I don’t do “news” much on this site so don’t know what the hell you are talking about. Was I wrong on the Cox “breaking news”? Nope.
And if you’re referring to commenters, I hope you know by now I don’t control them, either. And baseless attacks are frowned upon on this blog. Even yours.
April 13th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Mc Donough has personal connections to two of the three councillors “in question”. One of them is an employee of his. The other is an employee of the sheriff. Sufy around Mc Donough’s website and draw your own conclusions. My guess is Caulfield, but he usually sells his soul to the paper not the radio.
April 13th, 2007 at 9:18 pm
Prince:
I do not want to draw any conclusions. I want the truth to emerge.