Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
So far as I know, this important item I am about to write about has not been reported upon since the event took place nearly two weeks ago. So, now that I am back to blogging in some capacity, I will report it.
At a recent fundraiser for Robert McMahon (I am to understand it took place on August 15th), the object of this discussion, one John Cox, made a speech. It’s a speech to me so amazing in its blatant linking of his (Cox’s) fortunes and ambitions to certain council candidates, so open and honest, that the fact this has not been made public shocks me. I only hope that the Lowell Sun’s denizens didn’t even know about it, not that editor and Cox adherent Jim Campanini purposefully sat on it and muzzled his reporters.
This is from a very reliable source, and to the Coxites, don’t even try to figure out who…all I can say is, you might want to look around at your friends…people who depend on the kindness of cronies never know who might be angry enough to turn. Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
I have been informed that Mr. Cox stood up to speak at the McMahon fundraiser. Here is what he said (paraphrased but in quotes to set it apart with bold for emphasis):
Bob [McMahon]’s a part of the puzzle…I am…Alan [Kazanjian] is…and come election day all the puzzle pieces will come together and we’ll take the city back.
Everyone paying attention knows that Cox and the GOB (Good Ol’ Boy) candidates (Lenzi, Byrne, Kazanjian, and McMahon, specifically) are inextricably linked (some say, Cox’s BBFs! aka Best Best Friends), along with sitting councilors Rita and Armand Mercier and Bud Caulfield, and that this election for them is all about the City Manager’s position (or, why else howl and wail about the 2-year contract addition for Bernie Lynch, which would extend him beyond the reach of the next City Council should the unthinkable happen and the GOB gets another shot at effing up the city). However, they deny him thrice before the Cox crows, as they say…quotes in the Sun show Kazanjian and Company willing to distance themselves from Cox in public to try and trick voters into believing in an altruistic motive for their campaigns (oh, it’s not about the past! I just want to serve the city…yadda yadda *gag*)
Elections matter, and this one is about the future and past of Lowell - will the future become the past, and the past become the way of doing business again in the city?
A friend of mine recently explained it to my thusly. It used to be that nothing got done very well in Lowell, unless you greased the wheel. Trash wasn’t picked up properly, you couldn’t get a busted street lamp fixed, or a street plowed correctly. Except, of course, if you knew the right people. Rita and Bud and Armand come from a world where this is their power…the power to deliver services to their friends and friends’ friends. To be reelected by this same system, rewarded for doling out favors small and large. This has been the way of things in GOB-infested Lowell. Some years worse, some years better, but always with an undercurrent of a smoky back room where the real power lived. And Lowell has stumbled along with varying results, taxpayers paying the biggest price.
In swoops Lynch, a results guy (with a degree related to his job description!). Now, I’ve mentioned before that it’s hardly Bernie’s fault Cox got run out; Lynch merely applied for an open position after the fact, and therefore doesn’t deserve the grief that he’s been getting from certain quarters. But I did overlook Lynch’s overhauling of job positions in the last year and some months; for which he has earned the GOB enmity all on his own. Like the ending of the illegal gravy-train of bennies for board members, the movement of some into new positions, and the retirement of others.
To the GOB, this business-as-usual isn’t immoral. They suckled at the teat of cronyism all their lives, and were raised on it. They really do think they know better than the rest of us, and are doing what’s right for the city, I’m certain of it. Some are more greedy than others. I pity them as much as I abhor what they stand for, if I can be candid.
But the end results for the city of this sort of game are detrimental. We’ve been standing still for years…if we’re lucky, merely treading water. Advances in the great ideas from over a decade ago regarding the downtown renaissance have more than stalled - we’ve gone backwards. Empty store fronts greet visitors, jobs flee, neighborhoods deteriorate. My own new neighborhood cries out with neglect, a century-old stately middle working class residential area beset on all sides with dirty struggling businesses.
So this election matters. Transparency and open government matters. Good choices and long term thinking matters. We had none of this under Cox, and what’s more, we had cronyism, we had the hiding of important information from our elected officials like a state DOR audit letter sent twice to Cox and shut into a drawer. We had a tow-the-line-or-get-shut-out policy imposed on our citizens, our nonprofits, and our businesses. We had anger and revenge as policy drivers for far too long.
It’s time. For once, for all, let’s resoundingly reject the old life. Over the next couple of months, people of good faith will tell you how you can help. You can start by looking carefully at all the candidates before you cast your vote. We’ll be talking about it here on Left in Lowell, I can assure you of that.
This is about taking sides and doing what’s right. Where do you stand?
GOTV madness! Join a Get Out the Vote Rally for Jamie Eldridge at the Chelmsford Radisson, Merrimack Room. This mad event is happening on Wednesday, August 29, at 5:30 PM.
Come on, peeps, with 10% turnout this election is more than a tossup. But, only if the people who get out to the polls are the people voting for your guy!
If you’re gonna make it, RSVP to David Howard at 617-820-0683 or email at david@jamieforcongress.com.
Don’t fret if you can’t go, you can still donate to Jamie through my supercool Act Blue page here!
And they told me I would never make a good cheerleader! Well, I never tried out but they would have told me that. Plus, I was in the band. Way too geeky for a short skirt and perkiness…
As Dick predicted yesterday on his post, Contract Extension for CM Lynch that “The howls of protest coming from the pro-Cox caucus have been great political theater and it will only get better (tomorrow morning on WCAP will be can’t-miss radio).”
So I listened and co-host Tom Byrne, who usually sounds relaxed and laid back in his commentary, sounded a bit angry this morning. Maybe I am misinterpreting my former substitute teacher’s passion. However, I do want to address some of the issues that were raised:
Not having information on loan orders: I am not sure how this ties in to the extension of the contract but it took me a total of 5 minutes on the city web site to pull the data together. [8/28/07; $5,500,000 for sewer line cleaning/replacement etc.; 6/12/07, $19,000,000 for upgrade at WWTP; 6/29/07, $20,300,000 for the Morey School and of course the Tsongas arena ice issue.] And the debt level can be found on page 138-139 of the FY 2008 Budget which is posted on the City web site.
Why give a contract? First and foremost, CM Bernard Lynch requested that as one of the conditions of his employment. If you want to hire him or people like him, then you need to offer a contract. Why would any career public administrator walk into this political scene without any assurances?
Why extend the contract now? What aspect of his managerial style, philosophy and ability is still under evaluation? Hasn’t he proven himself in the past 13 months? Shouldn’t this be acknowledged and yes, rewarded? (more…)
Like Dick says:
With just a week to go before the primary, tonight’s UML debate takes on added importance. The Republicans begin at 5:30 p.m.; the Democrats at 7:00 p.m. There’s no excuse for missing this one. You can attend the live event at UML’s Durgin Hall, watch it live (for Lowell cable customers) on channel 8, see it streaming live on the UML website, or listen to it broadcast live on WCAP (980 AM) or WUML (91.5 FM). The best source of updated information about the debate is the UML website.
I’m making the effort to get there tonight (at least for the Dem portion at 7pm; getting there at 5:30 is problematic for me). Besides, I need a break from the constant moving. There’s like 20 ways to listen or watch this debate; if you’re still undecided (and I expect that if you read this blog you care enough to get to the polls on September 4th; do I even have to ask?) this is your last, best hope for peace making up your mind. (Bonus points for the first geek who gets the reference in that last sentence).
Off topic…say, Heroes is going to be available this week on DVD! Sweet. Some of us spent too much time on politics to watch it back to back last season.
While most of us are focused on the 5th Congressional District race and the upcoming City Council election, it appears that a not-so-quiet fight is brewing in the upcoming Lowell School Committee race and we should be paying attention.
This past weekend, The Column, the Sun’s popular Sunday feature on local political news, views, and speculation, carried a few paragraphs regarding this race.
Lowell Superintendent of Schools Karla Brooks Baehr might be in an increasingly uncomfortable position, particularly if Lowell High School Housemaster Dave Conway is elected to the School Committee in November.
If Conway is to win office, he must beat one of them [incumbents]. If that person is incumbent Connie Martin or Kevin McHugh, the fifth- and sixth-place finishers in 2005, it would dramatically change things for Baehr.
Apparently, Baehr’s critics accuse her of hiring and promoting outsiders as oppose to staff that is home grown. The validity of that allegation, if accurate, and most importantly its real impact on the quality of public education in Lowell will be the campaign topic for this extremely important election.
In the private sector, where I have worked all my life, we always try to hire the best and the brightest. Where they choose to live is up to them. Is there a different standard in public education?
One of the better local political blogs is one written by Methuen Mayor Bill Manzi; it is appropriately called billmanzi.com. As an elected official and Mayor of a Massachusetts town, Manzi provides the right balance between information, knowledge, analysis and advocacy.
Yesterday’s post, Cable Competition Comes to Methuen really grabbed my attention. Yes, this neighboring town has put the wheels in motion to evaluate bringing in Verizon to compete with their existing cable provider.
There is a measure, promoted by Verizon, in the Massachusetts Legislature to by-pass the municipalities and go directly to the State. Verizon will not deal with any city or town until that bill has seen its course.
Nevertheless, this is a good sign. If Methuen comes to an agreement with Verizon, Comcast will still continue to provide service under the terms of their existing contract. Methuen would also derive a financial benefit analogous to the Comcast benefit. Methuen may then serve as a model for the rest of us to follow. Imagine, consumers having a choice in cable providers.
The Lowell Sun is reporting on its web site that today Lowell City Councilor Kevin Broderick filed a motion to begin “to give City Manager Bernie Lynch — who has one year left on a two-year contract — a two-year extension. If successful, the move would lock Lynch in until 2010.” Next meeting’s agenda is not yet posted on the City’s web site so I do not have the exacting wording of the motion.
According to the Sun, “Broderick wants the issue discussed by the City Council Tuesday and referred to the Personnel Subcommittee for a meeting on Sept. 10…The committee would make a recommendation to the full council, which meets on Sept. 11.”
Two-weeks ago, the City Council took up another motion regarding the CM; this one requested that the Manager meet with the City Council regarding Goal and Objectives pursuant to his contract.” The CC referred the matter to the Personnel Sub-Committee which is Chaired by CC Bud Caufield and has CCs Eileen Donoghue and Broderick as members.
If you did not have an opportunity to watch that meeting you can view the streaming video of the August 14th meeting on the LTC web site.
So what does all this mean? Will each incumbent now be on record regarding the future of the current administration? As for the challengers, I am glad every one of them wants to help the City. However, I am also interested in what direction they want to take us and more importantly, who will lead.
Last night, the second of two debates for the Massachusetts 5th District League of Women Voters, too place in Andover. This was the first debate I attended where the Democrat, Republican and Independent candidates were all invited.
The debate was advertised to be a discussion on foreign policy issue. It really was not all that. If you want to read the details, you can check the Lowell Sun or the Eagle-Tribune, when they post it on their web site. Marie at richardhowe.com also posted on the debate, please check it out.
Also, WBZ-TV will be posting the video of this debate on their web site sometime this morning.
I want to make three points. I thought the Moderator Lisa Hughes was disengaged. She basically conducted this debate as if she was reading the teleprompter. At one point she lost track of who spoke. The best moderators are those who are aware of the issues, the campaign and have a stake in educating the audience.
I was impressed with the statements and attitude of both “independent” candidates, Patrick Murphy and Kurt Hayes. I think they will add a lot to the general election.
Whoever wrote the questions has a different definition for the words “foreign policy” than I do. As much as Barry Finegold’s, “three-state solution” for Iraq drives me crazy, I have to give him a lot of credit for raising foreign policy issues such as Palestine and Central America. That is what the debate should have been about; not trade, not the environment and not even how we end our involvement in Iraq. Those topics have been debated dozens of times but foreign policy has not.
For the record, Finegold supports a Palestine state, (so doesn’t Tom Tierney) wants us to get into discussions with Syria and Iran and is concerned about what is happening in Central and South America. I wish the Moderator had picked up on Barry’s comments and asked the other candidates to give us their views on these issues.
By the way, at the end of the debate, Finegold passed out to a form letter asking the other candidates to pledge that there will be no negative campaigning coming from outside sources. I am not sure what that was about. I understand what he meant by “negative” and “outside sources” but I am not sure what prompted this gesture.
Yesterday, both the Lowell Sun and the Eagle-Tribune carried articles on the recent loan by candidate Eileen Donoghue of an additional $125,000 to her campaign. I was struck by the comments coming from the Tsongas campaign. According to the Eagle-Tribune, a spokeswoman for the campaign said, “Having said two months ago that she [Donoghue] would not put more personal money in her campaign, it looks like she’s now breaking that trust.”
Oh, really! Perhaps the reason she has to put money into her campaign is that the majority of her supporters do not have $2,300 to donate to her campaign. I wish that Eileen did not have to tap into her own wallet but if you review the Tsongas’ list of donors and the amounts, you will see that most of the residents in the 5th District cannot compete financially with these people.
I have to admit, (and yes, with a bit of envy) that the list of donors to the Tsongas campaign reads like a who is who (i.e. architect Graham Gund; ex-Eagle Don Henley; a lot of attorneys at Mintz Levin) but this our Congressional seat. What should we do, let outside interests dominate this race?
Note: I am a Donoghue supporter and you will find my name on her list of contributors.
Tomorrow, I’ll be away from the internet all day (again) as I am returning the favor of my younger brother, who helped us paint this weekend (and did a bang-up job, too) and who is moving to a new apartment. Therefore, once again, I have to punt my blogging activities to readers and to Mimi.
I want to thank Mimi with all my heart for staying on top of things while I spend days doing hard physical labor (and days recovering from it). I promise that I’ll be back to stirring up trouble covering local politics forthwith.
[powered by WordPress.]
56 queries. 1.121 seconds