Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Some people might be cynical enough to say that government can’t really drive economic growth. But without government initiatives, how would this have happened? From the Guv’s office:
BOSTON – Monday, September 24, 2007 – Governor Deval Patrick today announced $2.4 million in state grants to the town of Andover to launch the long awaited I-93 Interchange and support the local road improvements that will support 100 new jobs and future expansion at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals and the long term economic vitality of a region that has been land locked due to the lack of accessibility. The grants, funded through the Massachusetts Opportunity Relocation and Expansion (MORE) Jobs Capital program and the Public Works Economic Development (PWED) program will help ensure that the region will have the funds necessary to support long term business relocation and/or expansion leading to economic development and job growth.
“This is an excellent example of what we can accomplish by partnering with industry and investing in our communities,” said Governor Patrick. “Wyeth has shown strong leadership in the life science industry and here in the Merrimack Valley and we need to ensure that this growth can continue throughout the region.”
The Junction I-93 Development Area is located in Andover, Wilmington and Tewksbury, MA adjacent to Interstate Route 93 between Exit 41 and Exit 42. Andover will receive $1.4 million in MORE funds and $1 million in PWED funds, which will go towards the design and construction of the highway interchange and local roads in the three municipalities. The commitment from the state makes available over $9 million in federal funds for the project.
Senator Ted Kennedy said, “This announcement means less congestion and significant new economic growth for the Merrimack Valley. I’ll continue to work with Governor Patrick and the delegation to provide the necessary federal support, so that Wyeth and the high-skilled workforce of the region can continue to grow.”
Just one question…not sure I agree that this will provide less congestion on the roads. Just sayin’. Of course, too many people getting jobs in the new area is a good problem to have…now, let’s see if we can work on public transportation and really get those carbon-spewing cars off the road.
Guess this thing is really getting off the ground.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.656 seconds
September 25th, 2007 at 11:12 pm
And these are the kind of projects Jim Ogonowski says are government pork. Has he mentioned jobs in this campaign. Has he mentioned these 1,200 jobs?
Marty Meehan’s ability to work with our Senators made a difference here in Andover, provided nano-tech funds to Lowell, and built key transportation improvements in Haverhill. These are the kind of funding Niki Tsongas is committed to and can work with as part of a new delivery system. I’m sick of Mr. Ogonowski complaining about everything from immigration to kids getting health care coverage. There ARE big differences between the candidates so get out and vote! (And tell your Aunt Mary too as well.)
September 26th, 2007 at 9:27 am
There is an insightful commentary by Dick Howe on the subject of jobs in the city, and some prodding for city council candidates to pick up this ball:
http://richardhowe.com/?p=509
He recognizes this to be a never-ending problem, so there will be no silver bullet that insulates us from economic turndown indefinitely. However, one common thread to economic success is education, emboldened by an attitude within the citizenry that prioritizes education (not just education funding, by the way) and work ethic as keys to success.
Government’s role in this to to provide support (quality education, common infrastructure, proper zoning and ordinances, safety, productive tax policy) and set high goals, but to otherwise stay out of the way. Initiatives such as the JAM plan run the risk of compromising some of the requirements (overspending limited resources results in unproductive tax policy) in order to achieve others (setting high goals).
So, how should the city council candidates weigh in on the economic development agenda? We should expect them to set policy (sets of goals, and maybe some specific objectives along the way), but they should leave the “how to achieve” to the city administration, although they may have to pass some “test of reasonableness” to each one that they take on. I would suggest the following areas to considered:
1. Long term fiscal policy, including taxes
2. Education at all levels
3. Transportation and communication infrastructure
4. Zoning and Ordinances, including long term land use
5. Public safety and quality of life for citizens
September 26th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Wait:
You’re right, well said Dick.