Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
David Bernstein over at Talking Politics has a great post articulating how Ogo has misstepped in this race by allowing, or seeming to allow anyway, the national Republican party to dictate what his campaign should be doing (a point I am making, not him).
Once you get past immigration, though, Ogonowski’s kinda screwed — which is a big reason why, in last week’s NECN debate, his answer to pretty much every non-immigration policy question was: “I don’t know, but there should be a bipartisan, non-bickering process to figure out the best solution.” […]
This is why SCHIP has posed such an existential crisis for his campaign. To put it plainly, in the SCHIP showdown, voters think that Bush is WAY more wicked suckier than the Congressional Democrats.
This is awfully bad luck for Ogo: who the hell knew that Congress would get together in a non-bickering, bipartisan fashion, and work out an imperfect but undoubtedly positive bill on a mom-pop-and-apple-pie issue, and that George Bush would veto it in such a grotesque fashion that polls show 85% of the public wants him overriden — a mindboggling level of public unanimity usually reserved for questions like “should the US try to prevent Iran from arming anti-American terrorists with nuclear weapons?”
If Ogonowski says he would vote to uphold the veto, he’s taking Bush’s side in the galactic struggle of good vs. evil. If he supports the override, he’s conceding that, contrary to the entire basis of his campaign, the Democratic-led Congress is the solution, and Bush and the obstructionist Republicans are the problem.
Nicely analyzed, and about what I’m feeling about this race though he puts it a lot better. Go read the whole thing.
[powered by WordPress.]
43 queries. 0.618 seconds
October 9th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
Bernstein is an obvious lefty.
When he attacks Ogonowski on his choice of framing the election .. he mucks it all up:
Not at all what Jim said. He said it was a referendum against ALL of Congress, and its inability to get anything done. He spoke to their failure on energy, race relations, health care, etc.
This guy is just trying to redefine the election to the way he wants it to be.. D vs R rather than what it is: Insider vs Outsider, party rubber stamp vs independent thinker, Whole Foods vs Market Basket.
This snarky remark:
Just rewords what Jim is saying, that both sides need to find a process to get what needs to be done.. done.
And again, using his snide attitude, he refers to Ogonowski’s new ad this way
When the Lowell Sun correctly says that the point of this ad was to avoid any negativity. No one can blame the guy for bringing forward his own history with 9/11. Tsongas had Clinton in to talk about her dead husband.
October 9th, 2007 at 2:34 pm
Ogo’s the worst kind of insider…taking his marching orders from the Washington consultant class in the last couple of months. Don’t tell me he isn’t. It’s so painfully obvious to everyone.
However, Niki has constantly talked about the issues. Ogo can’t even articulate how he’d vote on SCHIP override. He’s the great equivocator.