Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

November 13, 2007

I Can Count Also

by at 8:55 am.

No, I am not referring to the 5-4 vote in the upcoming Mayoral selection but the split in the School Committee which much to my regret will probably result in School Superintendent Karla Brooks Baehr not having her contract renewed next year.

I could give a long list of the School System’s improvement under her leadership but does it really matter? No one is listening; they have already decided. Margaret posted on Jackie’s blog the 10 top accomplishments. But was anyone paying attention? The Lowell Sun in their non-endorsement endorsement of the School Committee members really took a swipe at the improvements that has been made in the past few years. The only one to answer them was School Committeewoman Jackie Doherty who basically said thanks but no thanks.” And we all know what she got for sticking to her principles.

As Jackie pointed out, the newspaper in its endorsement took an opportunity to make some broad-brush, negative observations about the state of our schools, without any factual support. For example, the critics of the Superintendent deride Lowell’s MCAS scores but what they fail to acknowledge are the very significant improvements. This year’s MCAS results show Lowell closing the gap with the suburban districts.

The problem is that most of us are not paying attention to what is happening in our public school system. Public discourse is controlled by a handful of critics with media connections and access to a political network; individuals, who are driven by personal agendas rather than by a genuine interest in educational improvements.

The two major issues raised by her critics are that the school department does not promote from within and that Lowell High School Headmaster Bill Samaras is being forced out. If you recall, he was suppose to have retired last June but requested and received an extension to 2007. Now he wants another extension and he has successfully been able to rally his powerful friends around his cause célèbre.

As for hiring and promoting from within, yesterday’s paper has an article on the issue. If and when Dr. Baher is allowed to present the report that was prepared with stats and figures, maybe her critics will back down. I doubt it, though. Since there are no grounds for dismissal, they have become a group in search of one; and they will not stop until she is no longer here.

According to the School Superintendent’s contract, she needs to inform the School Committee by December 1st if she intends in asking for a renewal or an extension on that contract. As of now, she has two solid supporters and one probable; the odds are not in her favor. If the Sun is correct, it does not look like she will have an ally in the new mayor. So, I can count, 4-3 at best.

Do these people have a replacement waiting in the wings? Do they realize how difficult it is to find a qualified school superintendent? Haven’t they followed the difficulties Boston had in finally finding someone who wanted to come there? And do they know the cost? Look at the salary and benefits extended to the new superintendent in some of our neighboring towns?

All that does not matter. Dr. Baehr’s crime was that she did not schmooze and she did not realize how many powerful FOBs (Friends of Bill, Samaras not Clinton) they are in this town. We could ask her to stay and fight but it is not fair. We let her and more importantly her mission—striving for excellence in schools—down.

17 Responses to “I Can Count Also”

  1. Lynne Says:

    Since there are no grounds for dismissal, they have become a group in search of one; and they will not stop until she is no longer here.

    You nailed it, Mimi…this isn’t about progress in our schools, our kids, or anything. This is about resenting an outsider coming in and making decisions that are based on something other than a good ol’ boy mentality. It’s another harmful witch hunt.

    And our kids will suffer for it.

  2. Lynne Says:

    FYI - how many teachers in a single school system want to move up to VP and principal positions?? THAT is what I want to know. If I were a teacher, I’d want nothing to do with becoming part of the administration…different skill sets, different job descriptions, even often different schooling backgrounds.

    It would be stupid to force teachers to go into jobs they might not want, doncha think?

    It doesn’t seem, by the numbers, that there’s anything stopping any teacher or employee in the system from moving up if they so desire. In fact, they’ve been cherry picked over outsiders in almost every case where one has applied. But really, how realistic is it to expect that many teachers to want to move into admin? Honestly, this is much ado about less than nothing, so far as I’ve been able to gleam.

  3. Mr. Lynne Says:

    Have to disagree here. Depending on the salary benefits of such a promotion, I’d think that a decent number of teachers wouldn’t mind the promotion at all, whether or not it is a good application of their skill set or less fulfilling. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if pay lured a certain percentage of teachers away from direct involvement in the classroom. Whether or not such a move is the best thing for the kids or the administration is, of course, a different question.

  4. Sarah N. Says:

    I would talk to teachers first before coming to these conclusions. I know a lot of teachers in Lowell (both fairly new and teachers that have been in the school sytem for a long time)and they all say morale is at an all time low. And a lot of it has to do w/ the superintendent. I know one instance (I will not name names) where she demoted a high up admin person who was extremely well liked by students, teachers and parents. The school was doing well and there were never any incidents (unlike with some of the people brought in). There is a lot more going on in the schools than we are all told. I realize I don’t know all sides of the story but I don’t believe a blanket statement that disproval of the superintendent is all about resenting outsiders can be made.

  5. Mimi Says:

    Sarah:

    Are you suggesting that those who do not want Karla here know information that will reflect poorly on her performance and are holding it back? I do not believe that. She has some powerful detractors who know how to leak information. This woman’s every move are being scrutinized.

    Frankly, can we talk about a little bit more about the children rather than keeping talking about the teachers. They have a union president who has no problems getting access to the media to plead their case. And does a very good job, I might add.

  6. Sarah N. Says:

    No I wasn’t implying that. Nothing is being held back (that I know of), but not everything is known or reported to the public. Some moves get more attention than others, and the Sun (even w/ the union’s president) is not pro-teacher by anymeans.

    And you can’t talk about the children without discussing the teachers. Teachers are vital to the schools.

  7. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    Don’t forget, the Sun is completely in favor of the elimination of an elected school committee over the installation of an appointed board.

    Much easiler to impose their will on folks who are appointed to their terms *and probably a decent salary and bennies* than someone who has to answer to the few voters that bother for their actions.

    So much for the democratic process as long as it gives Wallace and Campy control then we don’t need no stinkin democratic process!

    As for demoting popular administrators, I will draw an analogy with the Patriots. Pete Carroll was well liked by his players…couldn’t win but was well liked.

  8. LHS Says:

    People at the High School do not apply for admin positions because Bill, Wendy, etc. are so awful to work with/for. There are open admin positions now that nobody applied for.

  9. Mr. Lynne Says:

    LHS: Do you know this because you are or know teachers in the High School? Would you say that it is a fair assessment that the morale problem might improve were Superintendent to retire? If he were to retire, is the remaining administration still a cause for low morale?

  10. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    Who’s Wendy?

  11. Mr. Lynne Says:

    Presumably Dr. Wendy Jack, Director of Curriculum & Instruction.

  12. grizzled veteran Says:

    Eleanor, you don’t know Jack? :-)

  13. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    Jack who? I double dog dare you! :)

  14. Shawn Says:

    Mimi.. this is unfair:

    Public discourse is controlled by a handful of critics with media connections and access to a political network; individuals, who are driven by personal agendas rather than by a genuine interest in educational improvements.

    I have met and talked with many members of the school committee over the years, and find that every one of them is interested in what they think is best for the education of the kids.

    That is their agenda.

    If, in their opinion, that means supporting one teacher/coach/principal/administrator over another.. that’s still fulfilling their agenda.

    When it comes to a school committee, nobody is in it for themselves.. its always for the program.

    Just because their opinion does not match yours does not mean that they are wrong or you are right… it means you disagree. We can do that without implying false motive.

    Judge them on their actions and results, not on perception of motive.

  15. Mimi Says:

    Shawn:

    Where does it say anything about the School Committee in that sentence? Also, to this day, I do not know what KBB has done to deserve getting shoved out the door. All I hear is that she does not communicate well and she does not want to extend the contract of the High School Headmaster for another year.

    What are her failures? Are those two issues cause for dismissal?

    Forgive me, but I find it ironic that you are trying to lecture me on my views of my city’s school committee. If I am not mistaken, you had some strong opinions on the actions of your town’s school committee. :-)

  16. confused Says:

    Wasn’t the former city manager’s “lack of communication” the first step in getting him out the door? I think we need to be fair and wait for the facts to come out. I think the results of the Teacher Survey will be a crucial piece of information to utilize…..

  17. Mimi Says:

    Confused:

    Slight difference. The lack of communication on the part of the previous CM was with the City Council; are you suggesting that the majority of School Committee members find her and her staff not communicating with them? I understand that there is a minority opinion that believes that and now it looks like it will turn into the majority opinion with the new School Committee but I do not believe that the majority of the current School Committee, including the Chair, believes that.

    KBB lack of communication criticism was based on the observation by some that she is not in the community enough to satisfy them. And I agree with that observation to a certain degree; but is it an offense worth dismissing your Superintendent? We did not hire her to schmooze in the community; we hired her to manage the education of 14,000 children.

    Back in October 2006, I wrote a tongue-in-cheek advise column to Karla about “being more active in the community.”

    http://www.leftinlowell.com/2006/10/24/the-other-superintendent/

    Is this what these people want?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

November 2007
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 0.580 seconds