Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
I may have to change my mind about hydrogen.
Every week seems to bring more breakthroughs and positive developments regarding renewable energy. However, getting these products to market fast enough would require our government to actually invest in incentives and infrastructure. They would have to stop giving away the store to Big Oil and Big Coal. I’m not holding my breath.
Update: And I’ve been meaning to link to this article. You have to read it.
What’s more, the turbine will burn biodiesel, a renewable fuel with much lower emissions than normal diesel; a hydrogen-injection system will then cut those low emissions in half. And when it’s time to fill the tank, he’ll be able to just pull up to the back of a diner and dump in its excess french-fry grease–as he does with his many other Hummers. Oh, yeah, he adds, the horsepower will double–from 300 to 600.
“Conservatively,” Goodwin muses, scratching his chin, “it’ll get 60 miles to the gallon. With 2,000 foot-pounds of torque. You’ll be able to smoke the tires. And it’s going to be superefficient.”
He laughs. “Think about it: a 5,000-pound vehicle that gets 60 miles to the gallon and does zero to 60 in five seconds!”
Yet, our government and our companies languish in stupidity while Rome burns.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.673 seconds
November 13th, 2007 at 10:11 pm
I posted this on the thread “Is biofuels the way to go?” just before it fell off the page, I think its relevant to this.
Eleanor Rigby Says:
November 10th, 2007 at 6:26 pm
Actually the battery storage technology does exist. There is a car company in California (where else) that has designed a high end sports car. Apparently the founder of the company couldn’t find an electric car he liked so he found the right battery technology and designed his own.
Check it out: http://www.teslamotors.com/
November 13th, 2007 at 10:14 pm
ER, I’m sure his innovation along with many others over the past decades, will sell their product to a company, only to have it shelved by Big Energy, so as to perpetuate our dependance.
November 13th, 2007 at 10:35 pm
I’m not so sure about that. They have been around for a while now, over a year since I first heard about them and reached their sales target so that they could continue mfg and development.
Initially they planned to develop a more ‘modestly’ priced family car down the road (pun intended)
I don’t know if that’s still in the works or not, but if they can overcome obsticles like distribution and keeping up with demand I think they have a chance to make a go of it.
November 14th, 2007 at 9:55 am
It seems that electric power may be the way to go, as it is clean (in itself), reliable (ages well) and with distribution systems in place. Other than heating systems, most electrically powered devices are pretty efficient.
Electric power can be created by many means, hydro, solar, wind, nuclear, fossil fuel burning, fuel cells, etc. The challenge should be to be able to produce it in the most environmentally favorable manner with high efficiency, and with an indefinite source of supply.
So, with few exceptions, shouldn’t the technology of power systems be focused on electric power generation, transmission, storage and use? Such a focus may expedite progress in that area.
November 15th, 2007 at 1:01 pm
Ever since reading Rifkin’s “The Hydrogen Economy”, I’ve been sort of hoping that the cost and storage issues for hydrogen would be worked out. Here is a recent solution to the cost issue.
http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/34860/118/