Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

December 4, 2007

Hamilton Canal Vision Sessions

by at 10:55 am.

[Bumped as a reminder –Lynne]

It’s become that time! Trinity Financial is hosting their first in a series of public “vision sessions” for the Hamilton Canal project. This will be the public’s opportunity to inject its voice into the development process for that district, so if you are so inclined to have a point of view regarding the future of this section of Lowell and its mixed use, here’s your chance.

The first meeting will take place Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 5:45 PM to 9 PM, and will be a Listening Session. It will take place at the Lowell Memorial Auditorium, 50 East Merrimack Street, 3rd floor, Veterans’ Wing. There is free parking in the Davidson Street parking lot, and everyone is welcome. They are asking that people RSVP at 617-720-8400 or reception@trinityfinancial.com.

They have four more dates already scheduled as well:

Wednesday, December 12, 2007, Working Group Meetings, 6 PM to
Thursday, December 13, 2007, Working Group Meetings, 6 PM to 9
Saturday, January 5, 2008, Working Session, 10 AM to 3 PM
Saturday, March 15, 2008, Working Session, 10 AM to 3 PM

A PDF with all this information can be found here.cheap windows vista ultimate now

7 Responses to “Hamilton Canal Vision Sessions”

  1. frustrated Says:

    Anyone else hear that they’re putting in a “Rent A Center” at the site of the new garage?

  2. jdayne Says:

    The garage is NOT a part of the Trinity parcel, FYI. There is the entire Jackson/Appleton/Middlesex district and it is owned, variously, by individuals and families (for example, the land and building with the shelter are privately owned), by the City (the garage) and–if the ink dries–~15 acres by Trinity. Re: the garage tenants, there was a City Council economic/development subcommittee meeting a few weeks back (which a number of folks interested in the JAM area attended) which specifically addressed the topic of appropriate tenants for the garage. Marketing has just begun and I’d say that the City Council members on this sub committee clearly heard–and understood–the significance to the area of the tenants selected for the garage. I’d lay money on NO “rent a” whatevers or similar. Clearly, however, inner-urban Lowell may be a difficult sell to many retail operations and this in-transition district a particular challenge.

  3. Mike Says:

    I assume listening session means the developers listen to the public, and not the other way around? Either that or its a CD release party.

  4. joe Says:

    I envision…the Commonwealth of Massachusetts taking up the very best parcel in the entire area with a courthouse, and then not providing any parking.

    Because that would be totally awesome.

  5. jdayne Says:

    I should also mention that the JAMBRA group of JAM area businesses, residents and any interested party welcomes all comers to its meetings which, typically, are the 2nd Wednesday of the month and at Cappys Copper Kettle. My sense, however, from reading the posts above, is that folks are a tad more interested in blogviating than real time, on site interaction.

    I remain curious–where does the progressive community tend to meet in Lowell? what actual on-the-ground, grassroots efforts take place? Do folks go to CC or sub committee meetings?

    I surely enjoy this blog, it introduced us to The Donut Shack, but I would like to see thought as action as well as, well, thought at talk.

  6. Lynne Says:

    joe: lol, cynical much? Heh.

    Mike: this developer got picked for its track record in listening to what the citizens want…I met with one of their project people, actually, and so far I like what I hear from them. So I’m actually looking forward to this process, it should be fun.

    jdayne, I like your challenge, and you’re right to criticize. (By the way, if you ever want to write up info about the JAMBRA meeting either before to advertise it, or after to summarize what happened and share it with the public, please just email it to me and I’ll post it. Communications can be action, in a way, or at least lead to it.)

  7. intheknow Says:

    jdayne: “(for example, the land and building with the shelter are privately owned)”
    Not true, the shelter at 205 Middlesex Street in owned by the shelter. The soup kitchen portion is owned by a private party.

    The funny thing about the charrette process is that the whole eminent domain taking will be reversed and the city will have to start over again. I can’t believe that no one seems to be aware of the lawsuit in federal court concerning the property.

[powered by WordPress.]

If you are not on Twitter and want to follow our feed on Facebook, click "Like" for our FB page.
follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

December 2007
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

LiL Fundraising for Elizabeth Warren!

Goal Thermometer

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

42 queries. 0.456 seconds