Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Tonight the Lowell City Council Sub-Committee on Flood Issues (CCs R. Elliott, Chair; A. Kazanjian and R. Mercier); A. will meet at 7:30 p.m. (after Special School Committee meeting) in City Council Chambers. It will be broadcast live on Lowell Telecommunications Corporation (LTC), Channel 10 and streaming video on their web site.
This is the Sub-Committee’s third meeting this month. Here are the links to the LTC archived video for the March 3rd meeting and the March 11th meeting.
In today’s Sun Mike Lafleur has a timely and detailed article on the Merrimack’s flooding problems. It is a complicated issue. One may need to be an amateur engineer, hydrologist, and meteorologist to fully understand the specifics; and then there are the players involved: U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Boot Hydropower and of course the City of Lowell.
Lowellians are sympathetic to the plight of the residents whose homes were destroyed as a result of the May 2006 floods and who continue to live in a state of uncertainty. While most of us look forward to Spring, they fear it. But this problem is bigger than us. I understand the frustration and anger directed at City officials by some of the residents during the prior Sub-Committee meetings but this is a region-wide problem that needs to have the Federal Government take the lead and resolve it.
I think Congresswoman Niki Tsongas should make this her number one priority; actually this and the idle trains in South Lowell. Sometimes local government has limited capabilities and this may be one of those times.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.430 seconds
March 24th, 2008 at 2:42 pm
You know, consolidating all of Jim Flood’s business with the city into one subcommitee makes a lot of sense.
What?
Oh. Nevermind.
March 24th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
On a side topic, but related in that it is on TV tonight, there is the first of a 2-part Frontline program in Channel 2 tonight at 9 pm, entitled “Bush’s War”. Part 2 is on Tuesday at the same time.
March 24th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
The Boot-Hydro engineer has given a detailed briefing of the river and control system, but it still leaves some questions. He has said that in very high flows, there is little that can be done to reduce the river height as it is driven by the geometry of the river and the flow of water going through it.
What is debatable is how the flashboards on top of the dam affect the river geometry. It is intuitive to the majority that they tend to “back up” the flow, making the flooding situation up-river worse. The engineer says they really don’t make a difference, because at those flow rates they fail and the dam is reduced to its basic height. However, the “failure” is not so black-and-white, as there is partial failure which may not fit his models.
Making the flashboards controlable, or more easily failed should help, but with very high flow rates it won’t likely make much of a difference.
March 25th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
That was an ugly meeting last night. Kudos to the the engineer from Boot Hydro for keeping his cool. There was a fair amount of anger directed at him.
The issue of the flash boards is definitely something that should be looked at more. There were some very good points raised by the gentlemen representing the Pawtucketville Citizen’s Council in reference to the flashboards and their history.
While there are probably some minor changes that can be made by Boot Hydro I think the people who live along the river and the brooks (including myself) are at mainly the mercy of mother nature.
I’m crossing my fingers that we don’t see another 100 year flood this year.
March 26th, 2008 at 6:39 am
Here’s a news flash…don’t buy in a flood plain!