Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

May 14, 2008

Well, Let’s See If It’s “Less Work”

by at 1:05 pm.

Unfortunately, I had to miss last night’s meeting, and it’s not up at LTC’s website yet, though I plan on watching it. But last night’s “new Council schedule” apparently passed. According to the Sun, “supporters countered that meeting bimonthly will allow for lengthy subcommittee discussions on the off weeks.”

Let’s see if that actually happens. I expect a certain number of Chairs of subcommittees to still schedule their meetings right before the (now biweekly) full Council meeting, a most inconvenient time for anyone but them, and maybe retired people. For people who work, 5pm subcommittee meetings are a travesty, even more so now that they have probably increased in importance.

Subcommittee meetings are loose, unkempt, and informal. They are not run by the same rules as the full meeting. That means a whole lot less gets done, in my opinion, sometimes with members of the Council or the public bloviating without end and making viewers feel like the committee is running in unproductive circles. No rules means less civility. Also they do not have posted agendas. People trying to follow specific issues they are interested in are going to find this confusing and inaccessible.

I believe Jim when he says, “I don’t plan on working any less going forward”. However, I don’t believe that’s the goal of every one who supported this. The proof will be in the pudding, I guess.

The motion put forth by Rita Mercier, which passed, was very prudent but I suspect, nearly pointless (unfortunately). She asked that the biweekly schedule be reviewed next January. Even if the experiment is deemed a failure, is there any chance of it getting reversed? Even if CC. Martin and Milinazzo change their minds, they would need one of the others supporters to, also, as rules changes take six votes. Anyone want to take any bets againstme saying that this won’t happen no matter what?

Lowell, you got served.

5 Responses to “Well, Let’s See If It’s “Less Work””

  1. loving lowell Says:

    I do not see a problem with the new schedule. It is similar to what many Boards of Selectmen (I know they are a liitle different than the Council) and the Lowell School Committee hold. The governing and work of the Councilshould not all be happening at meetings. The councillors should be out in the streets, talking to people about what really matters in the city, and that is what the good councillors do. Maybe the extra time between meetings will give them more time to actually formulate meaningful motions.

  2. Lynne Says:

    Don’t count on it. I foresee just as many duplicate and useless motions (like the Mayors “let’s make sure we use local contractors!” motion last night which is seen about every three months or so) as before, maybe even more so.

    However, comparing the needs of the City Council to a town committee is a fallacy. I think you can safely say that the more people in your jurisdiction, the bigger, and more plentiful, the issues there are. Lowell is a city of 100,000 and with that, comes greater responsibility. Also, with the subcommittee meetings being relatively less useful in their makeup than you would hope, this literally cuts down on the amount of time the public has to really see action on issues. Unless there’s a huge change on the subcommittee meetings, things are about to get a lot less transparent.

  3. waittilnextyr Says:

    Let’s hope they don’t waste the reduced time like they did last night trying to hang the CM over issues like “how many classrooms did the temperature get measured in?”, “was the temperature in the mid60s or the low 60s?” “did the school department send notices home by mail or with the students?”, “didn’t you tell me it was going to cost too much to leave the heat on for another month, and it only is costing $4,500?”.

    Will they be so picayune with the budget when real dollars are at issue?

  4. joe Says:

    On the bright side, Bernie will now have to put up with approximatly half as much bulls…

  5. Lynne Says:

    *snort* he wishes! Have you seen the bulls… that is subcommittees? LOL

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

May 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 0.780 seconds