Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Today’s editorial in the Lowell Sun continued the drum beat started a few weeks ago in opposition to the terms of the new contract for the four assistant superintendents.
This saga started over a month ago with leaks and accusations of secret negotiations. Well, last week the School Committee in open session voted 4-3 to give the four Assistant Superintendents a pay raise. I am sure that anyone who reads this blog is quite aware of the circumstances.
As much as I disagree with the majority decision, accusing them as the Sun did of being “ignorant to the struggles of Lowell” and “inconsiderate about the City’s fiscal future” is not true. The four (School Committee members; J. Doherty, C. Martin, J. Leahy and R. Faticanti) voted in favor of this contract because they believe that this is the way to assure Lowell’s continued growth. I do not agree with their viewpoint but I still believe these four are good public servants and do not deserve to have their reputation trashed in this fashion.
As for the three (Mayor B. Caulfield, School Committee members J. Leary and D. Conway) who voted against the contract, I understand that one of the three who voted against it, vote for it during executive session. Now that the subject matter is public, executive session discussion are also part of the record. By the way, have you kept track of how much good press those three get in the newspaper while my friend Jackie gets slammed mercilessly. I guess that is what you get for trying to be your own person.
Actually, the three who voted against the terms of the contract got the best of both worlds. The Assistant Superintendent got what their wanted so there is very little or no animosity towards the entire School Committee and the three are now heroes in some circles for trying to “save” the taxpayers. I wonder if those three would have voted against it if they were the deciding vote?
The irony, we could have saved over $20,000 if we had not chased the previous Superintendent right out of town.
The fact is that we can no longer afford these kinds of contracts; not only the salary but the benefits. The sick-time buy back component should be outlawed. If the terms of these contracts do not self-adjust, the system will eventually break.
Who is to blame for municipal contracts that are financial killers to cities and towns? The taxpayer and residents are to blame. Not enough people run for School Committee and/or City Council; not enough people vote; not enough people pay attention to the business of local government.
I remember last October when CM Bernie Lynch in an effort to save the City some money, began the process to change the type of healthcare city employees would receive. I do not recall anyone coming to the meeting to throw bouquets to CM Lynch but the union leadership was there to voice their opposition. As a matter of fact you can watch the streaming video on the LTC site; you can see which elected officials defend Lynch’s position and which ones did not.
The newspaper can beat its chest all it wants and call itself the “watchdog” of the people but if it continues to choose sides and promote a political agenda, then the only thing it will continue to only watch are the backs of those who are patrons and friends of the “museum.”
As in, stolen car troubles, over the weekend. Luckily, it was our “throwaway” car, but after it was recovered with damage, we decided to get rid of it rather than get it fixed. So instead of being out several hundred dollars, I’m out a more than half a day’s work.
Therefore, today is not a good day to blog. I would probably say something I shouldn’t. (Like how Darwin should really take care of the idiot male teenagers that think it’s a good idea to jump out in front of your moving vehicle suddenly.) Ergo, utilize this as your friendly open thread for today.
I can’t even tell you how much I support and applaud Al Gore and his admonition that our half measures (not even half - quarter measures!) are not only short of the real action we need to take on climate change at this late hour, with two decades wasted, but also selling our nation and its ability to accomplish great things short. Getting off of carbon-based energy in a single decade is entirely possible, good for our economy and our national security. Say it with me: energy independence is good for our economy and good for our national security. Now, say it one more time.
From Gore’s speech (I’ve bolded some highlights):
I don’t remember a time in our country when so many things seemed to be going so wrong simultaneously. Our economy is in terrible shape and getting worse, gasoline prices are increasing dramatically, and so are electricity rates. Jobs are being outsourced. Home mortgages are in trouble. Banks, automobile companies and other institutions we depend upon are under growing pressure. Distinguished senior business leaders are telling us that this is just the beginning unless we find the courage to make some major changes quickly.
Like a lot of people, it seems to me that all these problems are bigger than any of the solutions that have thus far been proposed for them, and that’s been worrying me.
I’m convinced that one reason we’ve seemed paralyzed in the face of these crises is our tendency to offer old solutions to each crisis separately - without taking the others into account. And these outdated proposals have not only been ineffective - they almost always make the other crises even worse.
Yet when we look at all three of these seemingly intractable challenges at the same time, we can see the common thread running through them, deeply ironic in its simplicity: our dangerous over-reliance on carbon-based fuels is at the core of all three of these challenges - the economic, environmental and national security crises.
We’re borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that’s got to change.
But if we grab hold of that common thread and pull it hard, all of these complex problems begin to unravel and we will find that we’re holding the answer to all of them right in our hand.
The answer is to end our reliance on carbon-based fuels.
Today I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years.
This goal is achievable, affordable and transformative. It represents a challenge to all Americans - in every walk of life: to our political leaders, entrepreneurs, innovators, engineers, and to every citizen.
A few years ago, it would not have been possible to issue such a challenge. But here’s what’s changed: the sharp cost reductions now beginning to take place in solar, wind, and geothermal power - coupled with the recent dramatic price increases for oil and coal - have radically changed the economics of energy.
To those who argue that we do not yet have the technology to accomplish these results with renewable energy: I ask them to come with me to meet the entrepreneurs who will drive this revolution. I’ve seen what they are doing and I have no doubt that we can meet this challenge.
To those who say the costs are still too high: I ask them to consider whether the costs of oil and coal will ever stop increasing if we keep relying on quickly depleting energy sources to feed a rapidly growing demand all around the world. When demand for oil and coal increases, their price goes up. When demand for solar cells increases, the price often comes down.
When we send money to foreign countries to buy nearly 70 percent of the oil we use every day, they build new skyscrapers and we lose jobs. When we spend that money building solar arrays and windmills, we build competitive industries and gain jobs here at home.
I for one do not believe our country can withstand 10 more years of the status quo. Our families cannot stand 10 more years of gas price increases. Our workers cannot stand 10 more years of job losses and outsourcing of factories. Our economy cannot stand 10 more years of sending $2 billion every 24 hours to foreign countries for oil. And our soldiers and their families cannot take another 10 years of repeated troop deployments to dangerous regions that just happen to have large oil supplies.
What could we do instead for the next 10 years? What should we do during the next 10 years? Some of our greatest accomplishments as a nation have resulted from commitments to reach a goal that fell well beyond the next election: the Marshall Plan, Social Security, the interstate highway system. But a political promise to do something 40 years from now is universally ignored because everyone knows that it’s meaningless. Ten years is about the maximum time that we as a nation can hold a steady aim and hit our target.
When President John F. Kennedy challenged our nation to land a man on the moon and bring him back safely in 10 years, many people doubted we could accomplish that goal. But 8 years and 2 months later, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walked on the surface of the moon.
Of course, we could and should speed up this transition by insisting that the price of carbon-based energy include the costs of the environmental damage it causes. I have long supported a sharp reduction in payroll taxes with the difference made up in CO2 taxes. We should tax what we burn, not what we earn. This is the single most important policy change we can make.
Of course the greatest obstacle to meeting the challenge of 100 percent renewable electricity in 10 years may be the deep dysfunction of our politics and our self-governing system as it exists today. In recent years, our politics has tended toward incremental proposals made up of small policies designed to avoid offending special interests, alternating with occasional baby steps in the right direction. Our democracy has become sclerotic at a time when these crises require boldness.
It is only a truly dysfunctional system that would buy into the perverse logic that the short-term answer to high gasoline prices is drilling for more oil ten years from now.
If you want to know the truth about gasoline prices, here it is: the exploding demand for oil, especially in places like China, is overwhelming the rate of new discoveries by so much that oil prices are almost certain to continue upward over time no matter what the oil companies promise. And politicians cannot bring gasoline prices down in the short term.
However, there actually is one extremely effective way to bring the costs of driving a car way down within a few short years. The way to bring gas prices down is to end our dependence on oil and use the renewable sources that can give us the equivalent of $1 per gallon gasoline.
So I ask you to join with me to call on every candidate, at every level, to accept this challenge - for America to be running on 100 percent zero-carbon electricity in 10 years. It’s time for us to move beyond empty rhetoric. We need to act now.
This is a generational moment. A moment when we decide our own path and our collective fate. I’m asking you - each of you - to join me and build this future. Please join the WE campaign at wecansolveit.org. We need you. And we need you now. We’re committed to changing not just light bulbs, but laws. And laws will only change with leadership.
On July 16, 1969, the United States of America was finally ready to meet President Kennedy’s challenge of landing Americans on the moon. I will never forget standing beside my father a few miles from the launch site, waiting for the giant Saturn 5 rocket to lift Apollo 11 into the sky. I was a young man, 21 years old, who had graduated from college a month before and was enlisting in the United States Army three weeks later.
I will never forget the inspiration of those minutes. The power and the vibration of the giant rocket’s engines shook my entire body. As I watched the rocket rise, slowly at first and then with great speed, the sound was deafening. We craned our necks to follow its path until we were looking straight up into the air. And then four days later, I watched along with hundreds of millions of others around the world as Neil Armstrong took one small step to the surface of the moon and changed the history of the human race.
We must now lift our nation to reach another goal that will change history. Our entire civilization depends upon us now embarking on a new journey of exploration and discovery. Our success depends on our willingness as a people to undertake this journey and to complete it within 10 years. Once again, we have an opportunity to take a giant leap for humankind.
Next week, the Governor will be in Lowell for one of four public cabinet meetings. According to the website:
The meetings will be open to the public, giving residents a chance to talk directly to Governor Patrick about issues they care about most such as education reform, health care and the economy. Governor Patrick will also assemble his full Cabinet for four meetings in different regions of Massachusetts, giving the public more opportunities to ask questions and raise important matters in their communities.
I’m not sure what to expect from one of these “public cabinet meetings,” but it should be interesting. The Lowell event will be on July 22, 9am, somewhere at UMass Lowell (exact location still TBD).
So what would YOU ask Governor Patrick? About his sweeping ed reform? About the environment, green jobs, or the proposed Billerica power plant? Economic development? (And I’ll try to take the best questions with me next Tuesday if I can. I always have my audio recorder on me.
)
With weddings and summer and clients, I haven’t had enough time to shill for pledges for that Left in Lowell upgrade. But I still do want to get that underway if I can hack it (the time and money, I mean, not hacking the code.
)
Given that recently, I’ve watched two installs of WP (one of my own - not LiL, and one of someone else’s) fall to actual hacking (as in, the virus kind) that’s even more reason to switch to a more secure ExpressionEngine as soon as it’s plausible.
So far, generous readers have pledged $295 total towards an upgrade. That’s enough to at least buy the software, but I would really need to increase that at least twofold (to $900) to have a safe cushion. I believe I will need some outside professional assistance to import WP data safely (after all, we have three plus years of posts, comments, and podcasts we don’t want to lose), and there may be other plugins I will want to buy. Plus, it will literally be a few weeks of my time, with all the features I want to build. I’m willing to work on the cheap for this project, but I still do need to get some income for all those hours that I’m not working on client sites.
So, if you have the extra cash on hand (don’t pledge if you’re broke, please!) and still want to send in a pledge, any amount, I’ll give this project another few weeks before deciding yay or nay. You can email me the amount at lynne [at] leftinlowell.com (replace [at] with an @, no spaces), and if the project goes forward, I’ll send you an email with where to send the check. My thanks to everyone who have been supportive of this blog over the years, and I hope we can make this place even cooler with one of the best blog upgrades ever. (And I mean that! It’ll be really cool!)
Dick mentioned on his blog that a “new” obstacle has been put in front of the developers of the Western Avenue Studios. I, like the rest of you, did not watch the ZBA meeting on Monday night but I did watch the replay on LTC 10 this morning. I had written about the Planning Board’s re-affirmation of the plan a few weeks back.
Folks, the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) has individuals who are not on the same page as the Administration. Why were these people reappointed to the ZBA when they do not share the same vision as the DPD, the City Manager and the City Council?
This project has been in the works for years; it received unanimous support from the Planning Board, City Council, Historic Board but the ZBA decided that we did not need to develop that area of the City. Here is the link to the Sun article on the original ZBA rejection.
In their rush to protect the light industrial entities in that area, they are stifling the economic growth of this City. Manufacturing is not returning to Lowell, that is our past; but tourism and the cultural economy is our future. A number of the proponents of the project emphasized the economic component, that artists are small businesspeople. I wonder if small cafe/restaurant owners would be treated this way? There is no reason why artist cannot live and work in an affordable place located in a neighborhood with other entities. It is done successfully in other parts of the City. What is unique about this neighborhood?
The owners/developers of the Western Avenue artist work/living studios did their homework; made changes to their original plan, including a deed restriction and yet we are not satisfied. Why?
As Dick stated, the Sun did not cover the Monday night meeting and since the paper is our only news outlet in the City, word did not get out. Hopefully the blogs will do their job. This City belongs to all of us, not just a few.
And in the area of unintended consequences, will this experience (as well as the one that COOL had to undergo before it finally was approved) politicize artists and their supporters who live in the City? Will they become a factor in next year’s municipal election?
Oh, the decision has been postponed. All eyes of Lowell should be on the ZBA meeting of Monday, July 27, August 11th.
There are two, count ‘em, two bills which are likely to come up in the state Senate on Thursday that have a big impact on Democracy in Massachusetts and the nation - the Same Day Voter Registration bill, and the National Popular Vote bill.
This is your opportunity to call Senator Panagiotakos (or your own state Senator if you’re not from around here) and voice your support for enfranchising new voters, and for setting course for fixing the broken electoral college system. (Edit: You can reach the Senator at (617) 722-1630.)
The Same Day Registration bill is misconstrued by people who panic about voter fraud - if you register on the day you vote, you will be required to bring the same information and ID that you would going to city hall a month ahead of an election. The deadline a month before for registering is ridiculous. It disenfranchises a lot of people (including myself, when I found out that a candidate for office who months in advance had taken my registration form to turn into city hall never did so).
The Popular Vote bill will not immediately change our Electoral College. Instead, it’s an interstate pact, which will kick in once enough states pass it (states which hold more than 50% of the Electoral College votes). If passed in MA, we’d join New Jersey, Maryland, Illinois, and Hawaii. Read up on the NPV pact here.
For all that our local paper of record complains about spending tax money on anything, this headline (”Patrick’s cuts a blow to Greater Lowell programs”) is really amusing. You’d think they’d be praising what smattering of veto cuts came from Patrick’s pen. (Well, that would also require praising Patrick, something I don’t think this paper likes to do.)
I’m not even criticizing, I’m just really amused.
Anyway, that article has a good overview on the Greater Lowell budget situation from the state. I think we made out okay, all things considered. Quite a number of our programs survived or at least got half the funding that was in the budget. Given how quickly costs are rising and our economy is tanking, that’s the best you can ask for. And the long term outlook, I feel, is much better than it would have been had Romney stayed. Especially when you hear about a local business (Evergreen Solar) which is doing really well, despite the terrible economy. The green bill passed in the state will increase our attractiveness to current and future green businesses.
It matters who you elect, and what emphasis is placed by our leadership.
For all intents and purposes, Lowell, and Massachusetts, are headed in the right direction for sustainable energy and green living. We have a landmark energy bill which promotes conservation as much as it seeks to invest in renewable techonology. We in Lowell have made higher rates of recycling more likely with the adoption of a new mostly pay-as-you-throw system to limit the amount of waste per household.
All this is great, but a major part of the discussion has to be alternative transportation. With budgets for the MBTA strapped, oil prices going up (and with it, ticket prices), Boston and its surrounding towns are doing some serious thinking about the availability of safe biking routes for its citizens.
I’ve tried to make the commitment to bike more around Lowell, since I have the perfect live/work situation for it. However, the best routes for me to get to work include the Lord’s Overpass, and/or Thorndike and Dutton. Let me tell you just how nerve wracking that can be…well, nevermind, all you have to do is drive it and you’ll see how precarious it is. (I wind up getting off the bike and using the crosswalks at the overpass when I go through there.)
Although there would be some infrastructure investment (for bike paths and right-of-ways), and maybe an educational and promotional program (to alert drivers to keep watch for cyclists), getting a city to be bikeable is probably less costly these days than trying to build train tracks or run buses. I’d like to see the Lowell City Council begin serious talks about how to make Lowell a bike-friendly town.
Cyclists even could come from the train station, head to the Folk Fest or shopping downtown, and head back. A bikeable city is one which is more fit, and less polluting. I remember a fellow blogger who came up from the Boston area, bike in tow (so to speak) on the commuter rail who biked to my home from the Gallagher and then back again. This is the sort of behavior we should be encouraging, and what better way to do so than to make sure cyclists don’t get hit in the streets for doing the right thing and leaving their cars at home? Nothing says welcome more than that!
There has been some trepidation regarding our state funding for the revitalization of JAM and/or Hamilton Canal. Suffice to say, our funding has escaped the legislature’s concerns (as reported by the Sun a couple months ago) and the Governor’s veto pen. (Helps to have the Chair of the Ways and Means committee as your state Senator.)
I’ve checked in with both the City Manager’s office and with Senator Panagiotakos’. This is as listed on budget item #7004-0099: “provided further, that not less than $500,000 shall be expended for the Jackson-Appleton-Middlesex plan in the city of Lowell.”
So that project’s funding is on track and past all the hurdles so far as I can see it.
[powered by WordPress.]
56 queries. 0.707 seconds