Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive Massachusetts blogs

September 7, 2008

Lowell Cultural Council Makes “The Column”

by at 9:05 pm.

Today’s the Sun The Column had a piece on the Lowell Cultural Council (LCC) grant process focusing on the dissatisfaction of some in the artist community.

Even though my February post on the DPD’s release of the FY 2008-2009 Draft Award List for the CDBG grants attracted 50 comments, too many of us do not pay attention to the disbursement of grants by various agencies.

As we all know, the artist community in Lowell is now an emerging business segment in this community. And since many artists are not interested nor wired to understand marketing and sales, they rely heavily on assistance from cultural support groups to sustain themselves and their art.

According to the LCC’s web site, a public meeting was to be held this week at City Hall to “to review funding priorities, guidelines and application procedures” for the upcoming year. That is probably what triggered the course of events reported by the Sun. In early November the LCC members interview grant applicants and in mid-November they decide what cultural entity or artist will receive next year’s grant and the amount. It appears that they are the LCC makes the final decision unlike the CDBG grants where the City Council has the final say. Last year the LCC distributed over $41,000.

Members of the LCC are appointed by the City Manager. (The City web site is down so I cannot link to the LCC page; I will update it when the web site comes back up).

Well thanks to the Sun, I and other non-artists will be watching this year’s process

5 Responses to “Lowell Cultural Council Makes “The Column””

  1. kpems Says:

    Wish they would post how grants that were given out met the criteria:

    There are five major areas considered by council members in evaluating each grant application: 1) quality of project, 2) community benefit, 3) budget and funding, 4) planning, and 5) leadership

    A description would be helpful with each grant. Is this the only site with info. for the public about the grants?

    http://www.mass-culture.org/lcc_public_about.asp?coun_enum=151#grants

    I am not judging the quality of the art, but it would be nice to know why some of the artists work (that are not from Lowell) have a community benefit.

  2. Aspiring Artist Says:

    Does this mean that the grant process in Lowell is a crony exercise? I wouldn’t be applying for these grants anyway (I’m not good enough yet, I think) but now I’m not sure I’d bother. I mean, I wouldn’t want to do all that work and have it come down to the fact that I’m not friends with the right people or that I am friends with the wrong ones.

  3. K-R-S Says:

    Truth be told, for me, my focus has not been on this area of government fund disbursement
    It should be noted that many of the “players” in this community have a great deal of education, surprisingly in the areas of Planning, Marketing, etc..
    This area does deserve disussion, particularly when it comes to the expenditure of public funds, as we do focus on many aspects of public spening (or at least, try to). We all want to know how public funds are spent and assure that they that they are spent wisely. With guidelines and benchmarks (like every other entity that is receipt of public funds) it shouldn’t be a problem to come up with the numbers to support the dollars spent.
    kpem, I wonder if some of those in receipt of funds who are not from Lowell, if they do teach art classes to Lowell kids? ( I don’t know..).But then my next question is, are the funds disbursed regionally?
    Truth be told, while the funds are allocated to “Lowell”. Lowell serves as the service region? I would like to know the answer to that? (for my own FYI).
    Don’t get me wrong, I support the artists in the reality that they are an economic source and also as a consumer of their product.
    Was over at WAS last weekend (purchased a few xmas items and plan on being back at the end of the month.

  4. Another Aspiring Artisit Says:

    To k-r-s it’s great that you are a supporter of the arts and a purchaser of art but WAS is not the only game in town of Lowell and when you look at what seems to be the disproportionate amout of grants that are given to the artist at WAS, the organization at WAS and the owner and or his business partners well it seriously begs the question… what’s going on here? I have been told twice now by other artists who have been here in town longer than I : don’t waste your time if your not a friend of, as the sun has quoted, “you know who” and or of “you know who’s” friends on the board. I don’t know her yet nor am I her friend or enemy but why should I have to be. Is it naive, my inexperience in the art of politics to think that this be a transparent process fairly carried out?

  5. Lynne Says:

    I’ll be honest: I think this process is going to be in good hands going forward.

    No, it’s not too much to ask to have a process of giving out government grants be a transparent process. Also, that it be a process that thinks about more than “what’s good for the artists” or “what’s good for this or that group of artists” but “what will advance the cultural agenda of the city” and “what will yield the best economic results for both artists but also for Lowell’s revitalization plans?”. The latter actually being the important one.

    Like, for instance, an application by a local gallery might include trying to have a show with a renowned outside artist. Someone who would attract people from outside the city to come to Lowell. This has both the immediate economic affect (people coming in and buying, both art and other things such as meals) but it also has a larger, harder to measure effect of putting Lowell on the New England art map. That has a cumulative effect on Lowell’s ability to draw in tourists - for such events, AND for events featuring local artists! But we’ll never get there if we think small.

    With a set of guidelines that says the economic best interest of the city is one of the largest determinations of the receipt of grant money, this sort of grant would be very appropriate. But if the guidelines are only determined by local artists, I fear such a focus would be impossible. I mean if I were a local artist looking to sell work (I’m not, I don’t really do much art), I’d consider that something of a threat (at least, if I were not thinking big). Even though in the long run it might benefit me, I might want to kibosh that concept because I think it’ll hurt my own sales.

    Well, we shouldn’t let oil companies dictate our energy policy (Bush administration notwithstanding). We shouldn’t want our pharmaceutical companies dictating the rules at the FDA (again, Bush as example). So why would you solely want to rely on the population which is receiving the government’s largess in the arts to tell you what is and is not a good place for the city to invest its cultural grant money?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 4.756 seconds