Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Update: The Sun is reporting on its website that DSF Sports withdrew its bid. I do not know if Webber automatically wins the bid as is or will negotiations now begin. At the end of the day the City Council has the final say, so let’s see what happens. I am leaving my post written before this announcement as is. By the way, the explanation that the withdrawal was done out of courtesy sounds a bit hollow. If he wanted to be courteous, he should not have submitted a bid.
Jenn Myers did an excellent job in detailing the issues surrounding the LeLacheur Park RFP. If you have not read the article in the Sun, here is the link. If you are at all interested in the cultural, economic, social or political life of this City, this article is a must read. It is a good primer for the debate that has now begun in private and will continue in public, first with the Stadium and Arena Commission and then on the floor of the City Council.
There is also a good sidebar that appeared in yesterday’s edition which summarizes the details of the two bids, one from the Spinners’ organization and the other one from a business rival, ex-partner of the Spinners’ ownership. Great what we needed more drama!
The Spinners want a 10 year lease; they will pay the City $150,000/year and $50,000/year for Capital Improvement. The park will be used exclusively for minor league baseball. Ten years is a long time for a contract, don’t you think? The other group, DSF Sports, LLC wants a 3 year lease; $105,000 and a plan to have all kinds of other events (concerts, festivals, ec…) that would generate income, a portion of which would be given to the City.
Last week on WCAP during his weekly Q&A, CM Bernie Lynch had mentioned that he wanted this whole process to be public. I hope the autonomous Arena Commission shares his views. I am not a baseball fan but the ballpark for me, as it is for most Lowellian, is a quality of life issue: it makes Lowell a better place but it would be helpful if we did not have to subsidize it.
The owner of the Spinners, Drew Webber, has a lot of friends and supporters in this town and of course a track record, so I think he has the inside edge but we should not get sentimental about this decision. In my opinion, that is how we got in trouble with the Devils/Lockmonster contract.
I think I will need a guide book to understand all of the machinations that have already started. As Betty Davis said in the film All About Eve, “Fasten your seatbelts, it is going to be a bumpy ride.”
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.738 seconds
January 5th, 2009 at 10:59 pm
With an RFP, there is no automatic “winning” bid. The city is under no obligation to accept *any* bid it doesn’t like. RFP’s are pretty sweet. They also can set guidelines and rules for anyone who purchases the properties.
(I only know what I’m talking about because my hometown is currently on the verge of selling 3 different properties and I attended various meetings, obviously concerned that we’d have the potential of being completely screwed because of the economy, forced into accepting bids that could be too low. Thankfully, that’s not the case, so long as the city council, or our selectmen in my case, aren’t completely stupid/corrupt/etc.).
January 6th, 2009 at 1:24 am
Strictly speaking, the proposals that are responses to RFP’s usually result in a project award according to some pre-defined process. The particulars in the are spelled out, and once spelled out the evaluators can’t deviate from the process,… unless they want a lawsuit. For example, MWRA might put out an RFP and in the ITP (instructions to proposers) they will indicate how they will ’score’ each submission. An example of one such scoring scheme might be 15% on positive past working with the agency, 35% on the quality of the technical proposal, and 50% on price. If after the evaluation process it looks like the evaluators deviated from the scoring schema, it will usually result in a protest or a lawsuit. It’s actually pretty rare (depending on a project’s scope) that an RFP is written to be truly ‘open ended’. Investing the overhead money in putting together a proposal bit is usually seen as too risky if the scoring criteria are not clear. As a matter of fact, when an RFP is put out without clear scoring criteria, I’d be suspicious that some insider(s) is/are trying to ’steer’ a job toward a preferred bidder without looking like that’s what they are doing.
January 6th, 2009 at 7:27 am
Ryan:
Thanks. I understand that the RFP was for 5 years so maybe the only bid will not be accepted. Stay tuned.