Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Apparently the Globe didn’t report the whole story last night on the gas tax proposals (evidently, plural):
But administration officials, responding yesterday to a leak reported in the media, said the governor also was considering a gas tax increase as low as 5 cents and that no decisions have been made.
So there’s a range of proposals, only one of which got leaked, which was presumably not something Patrick would have wanted. I assume anyway.
One thing Ryan and I discussed on today’s Left Ahead! (podcast will be up eventually for downloading) was that the best thing that could happen with a large increase in gas tax is the elimination of highway tolls. Ryan’s more adamant than I on total elimination, but it does make sense.
I think this is the bigger issue:
The reports yesterday angered top lawmakers with transportation expertise who have not been briefed by the administration but who have been prodding the governor to take a leadership role on a gas tax for months.
“I come from the school where the number one rule is no surprises,” said Representative Joseph Wagner, a Democrat from Chicopee who has been the House’s top transportation official. “These proposals are surprises. It’s not my preferred way of doing business.
Though Patrick might have been doing just that (putting together a proposal for lawmakers) and wasn’t interested in this being released “piecemeal.” Apparently, someone else was.
[powered by WordPress.]
43 queries. 0.569 seconds
February 10th, 2009 at 6:49 pm
Actually just this kind of “leak” has been used by pols since there have been pols and newspapers.
You “leak” a 27 cent a gallon tax hike proposal as a trial balloon and see what happens. If it does not spark outrage great, if it does then lawmakers are more apt to agree to a lower number thinking they have saved money and can tell the public yay for us.
The flaw in the plan as I see it is the chips they are talking about for inspection stickers that will allow the state to charge vehicles on a per mile basis means out of state vehicles get a free ride.
The assumption that out of state vehicles will gas up in Massachusetts is unrealistic one since gasoline will be cheaper in their home states.
Also factor in the number of Massachusetts residents that will suddenly “live” in NH for the purposes of auto registration.
I did see today that Patrick is still thinking about a toll plaza for Route 93 in the Methuen area.
So I believe this “leak” was intentional to gauge reaction.
February 10th, 2009 at 11:51 pm
Of course we’re going to hear outrage at such a huge increase in the gas tax, but what really scared me if the lack of outrage that the Governor wants to put chips on our cars to track us. C’mon, even Bush wouldn’t go that far!
February 11th, 2009 at 11:11 am
Well, as I mentioned in my previous post on this issue, I am against the tracking thing, and so are a lot of other liberals I’ve talked to, so I wouldn’t say “no outrage” at least not from politically active people.
Even if think the current administration would use that sort of information carefully and get his whole entire slate of employees in every dept to do the same, I still don’t know who the next guy will be, or if any individuals wouldn’t ever abuse it, and the whole idea is just rather creepy.
February 11th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
I vote for total elimination of the tolls, along with every other vestige of the Turnpike Authority. Think of the savings from eliminating the whole toll-collection process that shifting this fee into a gas tax would allow.
That’s just one of the duplicative government functions that would be eliminated.
The trick is to raise the gas tax as part of a package, like Patrick’s, with toll elimination and boosting transportation spending. And rolling the Turnpike Authority into the DOT.