Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

March 10, 2009

Your EPA - Now, With More Environment!

by at 3:58 pm.

Elections have consequences! Tomorrow, President Obama’s EPA will be hearing the case from California, Massachusetts, and other states who are interested in raising auto emission standards in an effort to combat the global climate crisis. This can be done under the existing Clean Air Act, which gives CA the right to tougher rules and for other states to adopt CA’s standards after, but the Bush administration denied CA a waiver in 2005 when they passed the new standards.

From the press release of Environment Massachusetts:

Giving a green light to Massachusetts’ clean cars program would reduce global warming pollution from cars by 26.1 million metric tons by 2020. And from reduced gasoline consumption, Bay Staters would save $5 Billion by 2020 at the pump, according to Environment Massachusetts’ analysis.
[…]
In 2005, California adopted first-of-their-kind standards requiring cars and light-duty trucks to limit emissions that contribute to global warming. The standards would cut global warming emissions from passenger vehicles by 30 percent by 2016. A total of 13 other states—Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, plus the District of Columbia —have adopted the tailpipe standards. Several additional states are actively considering adopting the standards.

Finally, we have an Environmental Protection Agency poised to actually protect the environment.

4 Responses to “Your EPA - Now, With More Environment!”

  1. Tryin to Stay Anonymous Says:

    LOL, Great Tagline!

  2. Shawn Says:

    Great timing here..

    I guess you could finish this with..

    “Thus ended the American Auto Industry.”

  3. -b Says:

    Why doesn’t the government just mandate that it’s fleet of vehicles run on natural gas? The technology is already there… This would cut emmisions dramtically and reduce our dependance on foriegn oil.

    This seems like a no-brainer to me.

  4. Mr. Lynne Says:

    I’ve got to imagine that the upfront costs of replacing the whole fleet (or converting it) must look prohibitively expensive. The MBTA bus fleet conversion had the advantage of economies of scale, a coordination possible only because of central agency, plus they have a revenue stream that lets them plan scheduled obsolescence. My understanding is that each FD truck purchase is usually a “custom” order… I don’t think there is a statewide ’standard’ for these kind of purchases

    Plus I don’t know if anyone makes NG rolling fire equipment.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

March 2009
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 0.660 seconds