Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
During the bloggers’ on WCAP this past Monday morning, we touched upon was Dick’s (richardhowe.com) analysis of voter registration patterns in Lowell.
During that discussion, we asked why with 51,000 registered voters in the City of Lowell, do we get such a small turnout for municipal elections; in my opinion, the most important one. This is when a vote really counts.
Lowell is not unique. Look at the low turnout in our neighboring towns. Ted Panos mentioned Tewskbury; their elections were held on Saturday. A lot was at stake, yet the turnout was dismal. According to the Sun, the hard-fought election drew 3,649 of the town’s 20,053 registered voters, 18 percent.
In 2006, 21,00 Lowell voters turned out for the gubernatorial election. In 2008, 31,500 Lowell voters turned out for the presidential election. And what happened in between, in the 2007’s municipal election, well about 12,000 Lowell voters came out. Why?
In a recent post, commentators Victoria and ER had a lengthy discussion on charter changes, district representation and cumulative voting. Those are a few ways to get more people involved.
Dick has provided additional information in another post and he promises to continue with additional analysis. Maybe some activists armed with this information will formulate a plan and motivate the electorate.
Otherwise, it will continue to have government of the few for the many.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.731 seconds
April 19th, 2009 at 11:52 am
Beyond what Victoria and I have already written re: the issues you mentioned I believe we should also include lack of media involvement in the mix.
The Sun’s idea of covering CC races recently was to have drawings of horses in a fundraising “race”. Not many actual issues analyzed and the last CC election certainly had a few! Candidate profiles don’t cut it as covering local races either.
No matter how you cut it, WCAP follows the lead of the Sun when it comes to “local” news. While I don’t know the current news reader on WCAP I have been told she holds three jobs so she, as only one person, will not ever be able to do much more than she already is doing.
So let Wallace wax poetic about how great his paper is and his perceived influence on the city, but the reality is he is responsible in large part for the decline in voter turnout since election coverage is nearly non-existent and the paper continues to shed local news and reporters.