Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
In an editorial in today’s Sun, the paper asks the legislature (and for Governor Patrick, if it gets to his desk) to reject the request for a waiver on our city election primary. Some salient points, which have been made but should be made again:
Two years ago, state legislators warned the council to not request another waiver. Local legislators told councilors that deferring the preliminary was becoming habitual; they should either abide by the rules set forth in the city’s charter or change the rules.
Also, this, to explain why the Sun endorsed eliminating the primary two years ago:
Two years ago, The Sun supported the City Council in its push to waive the preliminary, but 2007 had unique circumstances. It included unexpected primary and general elections to fill former U.S. Rep. Marty Meehan’s seat. The two extra elections cost the city as much as $130,000 of which only $28,000 was reimbursed by the state.
However, there are no special elections this year and the money for the city preliminary election is already in the municipal budget.
It’s been pointed out to me, that in our last primary triggered by having over 18 candidates, there were a number of unserious campaigns, including one candidate who had pulled papers but was in jail. We had just 19 candidates. This time around, we have a great number of very serious candidates, much more than 19.
I also like this (bold mine):
We are additionally troubled by the council’s decision earlier this week to eliminate the preliminary regardless of the number of candidates running, which won’t be known for certain until Aug. 11, when nomination papers must be returned.
A big “duh” to that.
Finally, the really cool part (again, bold mine)!
In fact, The Sun communicated its position to Gov. Deval Patrick on Tuesday during an editorial board meeting. Patrick didn’t take a definite stance regarding a veto but said he hopes the petition never reaches his desk and that he would prefer to respect what a city’s charter provides.
I hope this is the case, and that’s why your letters and calls to Governor Patrick are so important. If you are a candidate who opposes waiving this primary, even better - make sure you let the Governor know you are running for city council and want a primary.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.758 seconds
July 24th, 2009 at 10:44 am
Typical Lowell Sun approach. Rather than editorializing on the subject BEFORE the CC votes on it (when presumably it might have some effect), they wait until the vote and then get themselves on the record as being against the motion.
They did exactly the same thing on Millinazzo’s motion to investigate the Sheehan firing.
With the Lowell Sun, nothing is on the level.
July 24th, 2009 at 10:47 am
Let’s make sure that every candidate that wants the primary to call and email the Governor.
Imagine the position it would put him in to be asked to sign it after every challenger voiced their position.
Better yet, in addition to the above some candidate to should take it upon themselves to write a single letter and get all the sympathetic candidates to sign it. Then that should be sent to the governor, the Sun and the Globe.
That might do the trick.
July 24th, 2009 at 10:51 am
[quote]… there were a number of unserious campaigns, including one candidate who had pulled papers but was in jail.[/quote]
I’m not sure that being in jail necessarily precludes a “serious” campaign for public office; James Michael Curley says “hi”.
July 24th, 2009 at 10:59 am
LOL Tim point taken, but in this case, it did.
July 24th, 2009 at 11:00 am
And Papa Smurf, is it that the blogs are leading the Sun around by the nose nowadays?
(Watch Campanini’s head explode reading that line!)
July 24th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
The Sun makes a great point about the differences between 2007 and 2009: in effect there were only 18 candidates and we had just gone through 2 special elections.
July 24th, 2009 at 1:47 pm
Smurf, you would’ve knocked the Sun’s jock off if they came out before the vote. People would accuse them of using their influence over the CC. You can’t have it both ways. Two elections benefit the paper. They sell more ads that way.
July 24th, 2009 at 11:03 pm
pc has it right: it’s great that the media is all together on this one pushing the council into a corner, but don’t forget that the sun likes a primary because a longer campaign season means more political ads to sell.
July 25th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
I’d never given much thought to what Papa Smurf said prior to this but he’s right. It appears the paper waited to see how much public outcry there would be over this before taking a “stand”.
As far as the Sun wanting a primary for additional revenue, no doubt but sometimes greed happens to line up with the public good.