Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

September 26, 2009

Did the newspaper article leave out part of the story?

by at 7:43 pm.

If you read yesterday’s Sun article “Club loses license for 17 days” written by Dennis Shaughnessey, you may be asking yourself what was License Commissioner and City Council Candidate, Ray Weicker thinking.


And this what the reporter wrote:

A troubled nightclub in the Centralville section of the city has lost its license for 17 days, after the Licensing Commission considered two incidents that occurred within a month.

The decision stems back to an incident on Aug. 8 in which a fight broke out inside the premises and police were not called, a violation of ABCC regulation 204. The commission voted 2-1, with Chairman Walter Bayliss and Brian Akashian voting to shut the bar for seven days, suspending the penalty for a year, with a year probation, and ordering Willy Topps to close at 11 p.m., for 30 days effective immediately.

Raymond Weicker voted against.

So now watch this 22 second clip which explains why he voted against that motion:


Yes, it is true that Commissioner Weicker voted against this motion but not because he did not want to punish these people but because he thought the punishment was too light. I do not know if the problem rests with the reporter or the copy editor. Since Weicker is running for City Council, I thought a small or not-so-small mischaracterization of his intent needs to be addressed.

As for the License Commission, in my opinion all three commissioners try to do what is best for the City; protect the rights of business owners while making sure the rules and regulations are followed. You can watch the 2 hour meeting streaming video on LTC’s web site.

7 Responses to “Did the newspaper article leave out part of the story?”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    Good job Ray, Wow! what a distortion by the Lowell Sun. If that is the only way some people get the news it makes him look bad. I hope the truth gets out there and fast

  2. Bob Forrant Says:

    Whether this ‘mistake’ in coverage was intended or not it ought to be corrected right away and an apology
    issued. After all, since the editor of the newspaper was recently compared to Edward R. Morrow he ought to step up as Morrow would have done and declare the paper erred.

  3. Mr. Lynne Says:

    Excellent excellent catch Mimi! ;)

  4. TPetty Says:

    I was at the licensing commission 3PM (not so convenient time for citizen participation) meeting and this is how I saw it. Ray Weicker, who is running for city council, wants to ‘look tough’ with the neighborhood folks so he proposes a 60 day suspension with an additional 60 day 11:00 PM closing time for Willy Topps. Brian Akashian proposes a 3 day suspension. Brian, you’re kidding me right? Slap on the wrist for an establishment (bar) who failed to call 911 after a woman bleeding profusely from the head because she was hit on the head with a full bottle of beer. I do think the penanlty to Willy Topps should have been 30 day suspension and not 3 or 60. But common sense does not always prevail. I agree that the Sun should have reported why Weiker voted against the motion …. but seriously, I think his suggestion of 60 days was politically driven, and not so much for his concern for the neighborhood.

  5. Mr. Lynne Says:

    I think that may be a reasonable position TPetty, I just bemoan the missing context from the article.

  6. TheTruth Says:

    If you watched the meeting you’ll see that Akashian wanted a seven day suspension suspensed for 1 year and 1 year probation and a 30 day roll back of hours for Willy Tops’ first offense…that is much greater than any other bar in Lowell would receive for a first offense. Akashian then proposed another ten day suspension for the second offense, triggering the first suspension for violation of probation totalling 17 days and the 30 day roll back. Both Weicker and Bayliss proposed 60 day suspensions for the first offense but after listening to Akashian, Weicker backed off the 60 days and voted in favor of Akashian’s motion. On the second offense Baylis supported Akashian’s motion but Weicker did infact vote against the motion because he felt there was no violation.

    Akashian appeared to be the only commissioner not grandstanding during the meeting. Bothe Weicker and Baylis proposed a lengthy suspension but backed off when push came to shove.

  7. Maggie Says:

    Leave it to the Lowell Sun to get the facts wrong. I have been told, whether accurately or not, that the husband cannot get a liquor license because he has a criminal record - so the wife had to get it. She obviously has no idea what she is doing. While Weicker may have been grandstanding - his coment about their “business model ” was right on the money. However - all being said , until places like Willie Topps , the C-Spot and others like them can be made to clean up their act or close, the neighborhoods will suffer.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

43 queries. 0.577 seconds