Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Plenty in the Lowell Sun on Lowell’s landmark election yesterday…
I have to admit, I really like the emphasis on environment and affordable housing that is mentioned by Patrick Murphy in two articles (one profiling him exclusively, here, another mentioning the winners, here). Bold mine.
Conservation. Using Lowell’s “vast resources,” from its natural ones to its human ones. Volunteerism. Enlisting students to help one another in neighborhoods that need it. Sustainability. Fiscal responsibility.
and
Murphy, a 27-year-old stonemason from the city’s Sacred Heart neighborhood, said the city needs to be ready to follow through on conservation efforts and zoning changes, not only in affordable housing, but protecting natural resources and making sure future floods don’t occur.
So rarely do candidates at the local level mention these two important aspects of local (or any) governing. If Murphy can bring this debate to the Council, that will be great.
There is interesting bafflement from Armand Mercier:
“I really can’t understand why I lost,” he said. “I think voters subliminally lumped me in with (Councilor) Alan Kazanjian because we are friends. It doesn’t make much sense.”
Really, Armand? You really don’t know why you lost, or why people might have lumped you in with Kazanjian? How can anyone be that tone deaf? The city was crying out about its reasons for being angry, starting with the Sheehan vote and ending with the preliminary elimination. You made the votes. You did this to yourself. It’s pretty simple. (And before anyone blames me and Mimi, there’s no way in heckville that this little blog set fire to the minds of the entire voting population regarding Sheehan OR the preliminary. We’ve love to think we can flex that much muscle, but we’re realists here. That was existing anger, tapped into.)
There are also comprehensive pieces on the School Committee and Voke SC races.
Kad Barma also has his take. RichardHowe.com has the data in a handy table.
Update: The New Englander has his take as well!
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.743 seconds
November 4th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
That quote from Armand is a real doozy. By comparison, Regina looked a lot better in this morning’s paper with her quote.
November 4th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Greg: agreed! That’s saying a lot.
November 4th, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Er, “saying a lot” that Faticanti is the classy one in this situation, not that I agree with you. LMAO
November 4th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
Quotes from Armand were pathetic….he was obviously living in a dreamworld thinking of eternal entitlement to win no matter what. His bubble burst. boo Hoo! And Regina….such bullshit. Probably few challengers because no one could stand the thought of having to work with her! Another jerk feeling endlessly entitled and empowered to say whatever she wanted to prove she could break a new superintendent. Off with HER head….They both come off as pathetic loosers with no insight whatsoever as to their behavior. And the Sun doesn’t even begin to analyze this behavior and what’s really going on and how it affects this city that could be great. We sorely need an additional paper! Thank God for LiL and other blogs….
November 5th, 2009 at 9:43 am
It is all your fault, Lynne. You and your fellow bloggers, Mimi and Kristin. Shame on you bloggers. HOW SWEET IT IS.
November 5th, 2009 at 10:03 am
I don’t know how many votes we physically moved, but certainly, I think we helped a little. Maybe a lot in the Voke SC race!
November 7th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
I don’t think there’s anything subliminal about it, Councilor Mercier. People lumped you in with Alan Kazanjian. Period, full stop.
Oddly enough, nobody lumped Jim Milinazzo in with Councilor Corruptjian. Funny how that works.
So sad. Armand was always the best of the GOBs. He was scrupulous in the performance of his duties, and he ran a damn fine meeting when he was mayor.