Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
The righties are frothing at the mouth at this video from Lawrence, where a witness talks about a poll worker *legally* doing what she should be - providing provisional ballots to people who are come to vote, but are not listed in the voting rolls, generally due to being at the wrong polling place. If this person filling out a provisional ballot truly is not a Mass voter, her ballot will be thrown out; if she is one, it will be included in the totals - once that is proven. This is part of the provisions put into place after the disastrous 2004 election where people were turned away at the polls, the legislation called HAHA or Help America Vote Act.
The only weird thing is that the witness here claims that the poll worker asked if she were Democrat or Republican, which sounds strange except that poll workers in primaries always have to ask this question, and it could be just a habit that the worker mistakenly said it here. There’s no evidence at all that any particular answer to the question would have caused a different reaction in the poll worker. That is if this witness is remembering correctly (this is all allegedly after all).
This idiotic claim of “proven” voter fraud in Lawrence is all over the conservasphere, particularly being drummed up by the likes of Michelle Malkin. It is being used as exactly the sort of outrage generator I mentioned in my last post. Hey, if at first you can’t succeed, whine, I suppose - but if you’re going to complain, at least complain about something real, not made up whole cloth. Good lord.
Update: and here is the other outrage generator.
This shows a woman with copies of the ballot - copies, not absentee, as this post seems to suggest. Anyone been to the polls today? They hang copies of the ballot right up at the front, usually, to show you what the ballot looks like before you head in. Now, so long as this woman is not violating the rules of how to conduct yourself outside a polling station (like distance rules), she has every right to a paper copy of the ballot (you can see line markings on the ballot, it really is just a nonusable copy) and to talk to voters as they go into the polls for her chosen candidate.
And finally…here’s the last news (for now) that they’re screaming about. Note how
Two voters, one in Cambridge and one in Brighton, reported receiving ballots that were already filled out.
In each case, the ballots were voided and voters were issued new ballots.
Right, so…what’s the problem? The ballots were not used, and someone is looking into it to be sure that’s the extent of it.
[powered by WordPress.]
42 queries. 0.291 seconds
January 19th, 2010 at 5:13 pm
No amount of facts or logic will ever convince a reader of Malkin.
And so we begin….anew.
Or as David Byrne says, “Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was.“
January 19th, 2010 at 5:54 pm
Talking Heads Jack nice!
When I lived in Holyoke I was a poll watcher because the city refused to do the right thing by law and give provisional ballots to folks who showed up at the polls but weren’t on a voter list. They were to be allowed to vote, the ballot sealed in an envelope and the legal issue resolved at city hall by the registrar of voters and not a poll worker sitting in a school somewhere in Holyoke.
The federal government got involved in Holyoke and order this to happen and I testified at a hearing regarding peoples rights to vote being denied. The law is the law, so long as poll workers and watchers do this properly and for every single person in question.
January 19th, 2010 at 7:04 pm
“Lawrence City Clerk William Maloney said he spoke with the woman in the video, who he identified as Isabel Melendez. Melendez is a well-known figure in Lawrence and program director at the Greater Lawrence Community Action Council, Inc. and hosts a local radio program.
Maloney said Melendez told him the video was shot yesterday and the ballots she is seen holding are actually samples. Maloney added he verified the ballots in the video were marked as samples. He said Melendez is a Coakley supporter.
Maloney also said as a precaution the city issued an alert to law enforcement at polling stations to look out for copies of sample ballots, which cannot be brought within 150 feet of a precinct.”
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100119at_polls_turnout_high_ballot_issues_reported/srvc=home&position=0
January 19th, 2010 at 7:10 pm
Dollars to donuts that this video will still be used as “evidence of fraud.” Nice find, thanks Kim!
And, as reported by the conservative Herald…that’s gotta hurt!
January 19th, 2010 at 7:41 pm
Well I just saw on TV that it is the Coakley campaign that’s calling this “voter fraud”…. so apparently it can swing either way! Funny that they’re already crying wolf - you know, just in case she loses.
January 19th, 2010 at 8:44 pm
Lynne,
That’s actually awesome news that there was in fact no voter fraud. I don’t like it no matter what the outcome. One man/woman one vote. Let the people decide. Fraud sucks.
I’m glad if what Kim found turns out to be true- although that’s just me.
January 19th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Actually when specifically asked, they said that they were not saying that the election was being stolen - a FAR better reaction than the Michelle Malkins of the world don’t you think?
January 19th, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Breaking news… let the revolution begin, rule from the center!
January 19th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
Or pass bills with reconciliation, like Bush did. We still have both houses of Congress, you realize.
This could be a silver lining, if the Dems learn to get their shit together.
January 19th, 2010 at 9:30 pm
There is a GOD Coakley is gone next to go is Deval Patrick and his Caddy and then the jerk in the white house So Lynne have a good time eating that humble pie lol
January 19th, 2010 at 9:40 pm
Unfortunately, that’s a damn big if.
January 19th, 2010 at 9:44 pm
And you wonder why, Joe, I don’t have a high opinion of your side’s ability to be classy.
Way to be a sore winner. Really, this is how you treat people when they’re down? Lovely.
January 19th, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Boy Lynne do you have a very short memory How about after the recent city election when you keep dumping on Regina Kaz and Hayden after they lost oh but that was diffrent You are one one way witch lady
January 19th, 2010 at 10:32 pm
“Breaking news… let the revolution begin, rule from the center!”
Corey it is great that you do not have to worry about exclusions in your health plan for your child like I do! Congrats to your employer for providing such great coverage. We should all have such a good bargaining agreement.
January 19th, 2010 at 10:34 pm
“You are one one way witch lady”
Joe, you completely lack class.
January 20th, 2010 at 12:01 pm
First, Joe, if you were saying that to anyone but myself (as the blog’s writer) I would have deleted your comment and you’d be getting a warning.
Second, my friend, when I attack those guys, it’s on their *actions* or their own *words*, not personal. Also, fact is, they are public officials with serious ethical concerns, which are continuing to have an effect on our politics even though they are unelected.