Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

 
Lowell 2009 Campaign Info
 
LiL Council Video Questionnaires
 

April 26, 2010

We Don’t Need No Steenkin’…

by at 9:43 am.

One really does wonder just how tone-deaf the GOB contingent of the City Council can get.

Performance budgeting? Putting more information for City Councilors into the budget? We don’t need no steenkin’ changes, no sirree.

But City Councilor Edward “Bud” Caulfield does not see any need for change.

“I am old school,” he said. “When I open the budget book, I want to see it listed alphabetically by department. It has worked for 40 years and I do not see why that cannot continue.”

Maybe, because, I dunno, there might be a better way? Of course, it’s possible Councilor Caulfield just wants to be able to peruse the budget in under two hours at his kitchen table. You know, governating is hard work.

Under the performance-based model, the budget document would include each department’s annual accomplishments as well as its goals and objectives.

Cuz *gasp!* - we sure can’t find a way to use real information about reaching goals, can we? Said Bud, “‘What goals?’ … ‘In this economy, we are just trying to keep our head above water.’”

Because heaven forfend we spend any time on actually doing more than keeping our head above water, right? Making any plans at all? Keeping our city employees accountable? All just terrible, useless things right? It’s too hard!

Our former Mayor is also complaining because the main budget document will list positions and salaries, but not names - names of public employees and their position/salary will be in an appendix to the budget. What. A. Whiner. Seriously. He’ll still get the information, but the new budget format will be, as the Sun writes, “focused on planning and goals and assists both the administration and City Council in making better-informed operational and policy decisions” - in other words, the Big Picture stuff. You know, the stuff that the GOBs have always been so crappy at. Which is why this city “tread water” for far too long.

Ya know, really, honestly, I’d quit while I’m behind, Councilor. Yelling “get off my lawn!” to the youngsters might suit your temperament and age, but it’s no way for an elected official to act.

FYI - let’s watch to see how Rita Mercier acts. Because she insisted, INSISTED, that she supports Bernie Lynch. But every time an issue arises about his management style, she and Caulfield come up with some reason to make a fuss - usually over nothing. (Did I say “usually”? I was being nice.) So, will she support the phased-in changes to the budget document (it will happen over three years) or will she jump on the Whining Bandwagon?

14 Responses to “We Don’t Need No Steenkin’…”

  1. RUDY Says:

    Franky Decouteaux is a REPBULICAN WOW!!!!

  2. Lynne Says:

    Uh, ok, whatever.

    Off topic much?

  3. Bubba Says:

    Hey Bud, your old school ways before Bernie came in almost bankrupted the city its 2010, your not a leader anymore so either follow or get out of the way, you hurt the city with the garbage you throw at the manager every tuesday nite your starting to sound like that other guy with the tow trucks,Rita seems to be more pleasant than you, your an angry ex mayor get a hold of yourself.

  4. Kim Says:

    Bud spoke at the City wide parent meeting tonight and I must say I agree with most of what he said. He said we need to get the teachers union on HMO blue, put a cap on sick leave buy out like the city side has, and to stop city wide bussing. (I see busses pulling into my daughters school with 3 children on them) These do not sound like business as usual suggestions.

  5. Tony Says:

    Bud’s upset because If they don’t put the names next to their job titles in the budget, it makes it tougher to de-fund the position of someone you have a personal issue with, a la Andy Sheehan.

  6. Lynne Says:

    Tony you aren’t the first person to say that to me…agreed…

    Kim - that’s great, but where was he on these issues when he actually could affect them, like when he was Mayor and head of the School Committee?

    It’s great to think out of the box on the issues you have little to do with…but his behavior at the Council meetings has been, to say the least, embarrassing!

  7. openyoureyes Says:

    Once again Lynne you parrot the administration line and Lowell Scum’s. The new format with goals and objectives will serve to only further cloud the truth with pie in the sky estimates and objectives. What will happen if those objectives are not met? Will the department heads, or GOD FORBID the manager be held responsible? Move the shells around and hopefully the councilors and more importantly the taxpayers will find it more difficult to find the ball underneath. Or maybe it would be more accurate to call this a game of three card Bernie.

  8. joe from Lowell Says:

    Bud’s argument about wanting names up front in the budget document, but not wanting goals and accomplishments, almost - almost, mind you - makes it sound as if he’s more concerned about making sure money goes to the “right” people than in the the amount of good it does in providing public service.

    You know, like the fight over the towing contract a couple of years ago, when he openly stated on the Council floor that he was upset that company that submitted a poor bid didn’t get a contract, because he knew them and they were good guys.

  9. observer Says:

    Bud has been consistent on the issues Kim raises, even when he was Mayor.

  10. Lynne Says:

    And wow, he obviously did so much about them.

  11. Lynne Says:

    And oh yes I am a puppet, just a puppet, see my strings?

    Please.

    BTW you’re wrong, the Lowell Sun said the opposite of me. Christ.

  12. openyoureyes Says:

    Than why did you quote them as supporting it?

  13. Prince Charming Says:

    Sophistry:The most popular career of a Greek of ability at the time was politics; hence the sophists largely concentrated on teaching rhetoric. The aims of the young politicians whom they trained were to persuade the multitude of whatever they wished them to believed. The search for truth was not top priority. Consequently the sophists undertook to provide a stock of arguments on any subject, or to prove any position. They boasted of their ability to make the worse appear the better reason, to prove that black is white. Some, like Gorgias, asserted that it was not necessary to have any knowledge of a subject to give satisfactory replies as regards it. Thus, Gorgias ostentatiously answered any question on any subject instantly and without consideration. To attain these ends mere quibbling, and the scoring of verbal points were employed. In this way, the sophists tried to entangle, entrap, and confuse their opponents, and even, if this were not possible, to beat them down by mere violence and noise. You can Google it Bud.

  14. outsider Says:

    Just a fun fact

    Has anyone noticed 7 of the last 8 posts are all negative?

    Who wrote them?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

If you are not on Twitter and want to follow our feed on Facebook, click "Like" for our FB page.
follow me on Twitter

Pages:

Recent Posts

Search

Categories:

Archives:

April 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Other:

Email us!

(replace spaces, ['s, symbols)
Lynne | Mimi

LiL Fundraising for Elizabeth Warren!

Goal Thermometer

Lowell Area Bloggers/Forums

Lowell Politics

Mass Bloggers

Media in Lowell

Media in MA

Other Daily Reads

Politics Online

Progressive Local Orgs

Snark and politics

The Arts in Lowell

42 queries. 0.586 seconds