Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
I have more questions than answers. My Socratic muse drives me.
- Are the terms now public? Some of the terms were shared on WCAP. Was that a “breach” or a “Press Release.”
- The SC and UTL leadership have come to terms. Those terms must be disclosed to the membership for an up or down vote. If the rank and file can know the terms, why can’t we? Or, can we?
- If one term is 1.5% pay raise to start “immediately”, if they hit June of 2012 with no long term accord; does the current contract come back or has the SC just handed the membership a floor of 1.5%? I’m going to guess that the deal reached, if accepted by the membership, will exist in perpetuity until a 2012 deal is struck. Or 2013, 2014 …..
- Will the UTL now turn its attention on the City Manager and City Council? Really, how could UTL leadership bind its membership to a long term deal without having the “bookends” set on their health care costs?
- Did the SC miss an opportunity to stake the UTL down on wages, allowing potential health care savings to come back to taxpayers?
- Does the City Council really think they will get to play with savings on the School side, captured by “plan design,” as they see fit? Like give it back to the taxpayers?
The SC is not coached by Bill Belechick. The UTL has a better game plan. I’m not going out on a limb to say this punt was the best play available, for both sides.
Now we turn to Bernie Lynch and the importance of the City Council election.
Update: I’m rescinding my football metaphor and substituting a golf ball. Did the School Committee chip it forward into the rough, the fairway or deeper into the woods? You play the ball where it lays.
[powered by WordPress.]
|« Sep||Nov »|
40 queries. 0.852 seconds