Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/leftinlowell/leftinlowell.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 330

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home/leftinlowell/leftinlowell.com/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php(10) : runtime-created function(1) : eval()'d code(1) : eval()'d code on line 1
Left In Lowell » Blog Archive » Campi Has This All Screwed Up

Left In Lowell

Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs

2013 Candidate Questionnaire Responses!

April 5, 2012

Campi Has This All Screwed Up

by at 12:56 pm.

Maybe by now you have read the offering from Lowell’s “Blogger in Chief?”

It starts out in a rather pedestrian tone:

Executives at the U.S. National Park Service and the Lowell National Historical Park are for preservation, period.

It is their single-minded job to preserve what they consider to be national landmarks and significant articles of value that promote their cultural, historical and educational mission.

They do a good job.

But, Campi quickly turns to set up a conflict. Not so much between the Park Service and Enel, but more between Lowellians that respect history and those whose lives are turned upsidedown when the Merrimack floodwaters come:

The Park Service wants to keep the flashboards on the Pawtucket Dam because they represent early 20th century history — not because it is a good way to regulate the Merrimack River’s waterflow.

Enel North America wants to install a technologically advanced balloon crestgate system at a cost of $6 million. At the push of a button, Enel would be able to control the water’s height, produce more electricity, and increase profits.

Enel says the system would also help control flooding issues in the Pawtucketville flood plain where 12 to 15 Lowell homes are at risk of severe damage during storms.

(Bold mine.)

Bolded because it is complete crap. Don’t believe me?

When Enel tells The Sun that 12 to 15 homes are at risk, and you print it in the paper as fact, I am in utter disbelief. There are probably thousands of homes at risk from flooding as the Pawtucket Dam holds back water for 23 miles. When Enel and FERC says that lowering the inflatable during high flows will work to alleviate flooding they are correct, but using the inflatable to lower the water levels during a flood, or even a few days before, will not work as good as the flashboards to alleviate flooding, because the flashboards are typically down for a couple of weeks, to a couple of months in the spring, draining the basin. - BOB GAGNON Chairman, Lowell Flood Owners Group

Next, Campi squeals a couple of hackneyed, conservative canards, re: regulations & taxes:

It appears, however, that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has had enough of this preservationist gridlock and is determined to approve Enel’s application for the betterment of the dam’s future, the river’s, the energy grid’s, and maybe even Lowell’s.

When the decision comes down, however, the Park Service will challenge it, leading to more legal arguments at taxpayers’ expense.

The next part is my favorite. Campi jumps in with both feet:

But the flashboards are another thing. They don’t preserve anything but problems along the Merrimack River. They are archaic. They are an eyesore to history and preservation alike, and we can’t believe that any first-time visitor who takes in the sight of them — broken and rust-colored — appreciates the plywood pile of junk as a “sacred” museum piece for the ages.

I’m not sure if Campi really belives we should put a skim coat over the Gaza Pyramids or what? What he misses completely, is that Enel controls the dam and has left it to ruin. I think it looks shitty, lately. Why now and not before? Also, the “plywood” is a cheat that Enel put in some time ago. We can fix the aesthetics, if only Enel would bother. Campi should rave at Enel for not keeping the Dam in proper order. That would be more fitting.

After breathing through his mouth for a spell, Campi comes back to us:

A crestgate system, on the other land, like the one that can be found in Lawrence, is useful and inspires awe.

You say “crestgate,” we say “bladder.” Useful? At generating a smidge more Watts, while externalizing costs to it’s neighbors. Yes, the power plant produces seasonal “water pollution.” And, it pukes it out onto the surrounding community. That is a process that is “useful” for generating ill gotten profits.

Awe? Oh!, that beautiful bladder dam. Let’s see, if you are awed. Click Here. (h/t Marie Sweeney)

Let me conclude by setting something straight. The Pawtucket Falls Dam belongs to YOU & ME. US! Lowell. Not Enel or any corporation or US Agency. Currently, it is protected by the NPS and used by Enel under a permit by FERC.

But, the simple truth is, it is ours and it is “leased” to a tenant. Do we really want to let this lousy tenant vandalize our property. In 50 years, we will be here and Enel will be gone.

15 Responses to “Campi Has This All Screwed Up”

  1. Magnolia Says:

    The fact remains that we would have to trust ENEL to raise and lower the dam when “appropriate” . Since they are in it for the profits, their idea of timing is not necesarily what is best for those affected by their biased decisions. I live near Black Brook in the Highlands. If the river gets too high , the drain backs up into Black Brook which then floods Princeton and our cellars. While this is no place near the devastion in Pawtucketville, it is enough to give us a serious appreciation for their concerns. Maybe Campi should be forced to live in an affected area. He might get it then.

  2. John McDonough Says:

    Hello Jack, first off I wish you and all viewers here a Happy Easter.

    This Biblical FERC decision of the enhancement of the dam owners rights is a for ever change. “The Crest Gate Dam” my chief consideration is the permanent saturation of all of the land surrounding the river, never to be dried out again. Boaters will be smiling and gardens will have a plentiful harvest yet “I think” with the climate change, permanent ground saturation in times of flood we will sadly see severe ground erosion and the probability of ground movement and an immediate shift in the rivers path. Those anywhere near the river should consider the protection of their property with proper insurance.
    John McDonough

  3. Jack Says:

    So, John. Could we say, while Enel profits, some value will be lost by Enel’s neighbors should the the bladder dam go up? Enel is pushing its cost to others.

    It seems odd, that as SCOTUS considers an insurance “mandate,” that Enel can deploy a business plan that mandates its neighbors buy insurance.

  4. kmarcin Says:

    There are almost 300 downtown residents who are now being forced by their mortgage companies to by flood insurance. Canal Place residents have spent a considerable amount of money having an elevation survey done but ENEL has not responded to repeated requests for information to complete the FEMA application to ammend the flood map.

  5. Robert Forrant Says:

    KMarcin’s note above about ENEL’s failure to provide information ought to be proof enough that ‘lil Campi’ is in the power giant’s pocket and doing its bidding as opposed to the local paper actually caring about how the city’s residents could be impacted by a bad decision. Fascinating too, that he attempts to pick a fight with one of Lowell’s most solid of citizens, the National Park.

  6. Magnolia Says:

    Maybe someone with better computer skills than me can find the article I found last year about an ENEL bladder dam bursting and killing someone. I don’t believe it was anyplace near gere - but still…..

  7. kmarcin Says:

    Update: I heard from ENEL engineer today…step in the right direction. Will let you know how it goes.

    I agree with Prof Forrant; why the NPS?

  8. joe from Lowell Says:

    Executives at the U.S. National Park Service and the Lowell National Historical Park are for preservation, period.

    It is their single-minded job to preserve what they consider to be national landmarks and significant articles of value that promote their cultural, historical and educational mission.

    They do a good job.

    But the Park Service isn’t infallible.

    Its preservation mission sometimes collides with modernizing the world in which people live — even if modernization produces a positive impact.

    This is so grotesquely misguided. How can anyone who has had a bird’s-eye view of Lowell’s renaissance over the past two decades possibly believe that preservation is an impediment to progress, or that the National Park Service in Lowell has been anything but a contributor to progress in this community?

  9. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    Jack, before I weigh in on this I need you to explain one line in your post:

    ” I think it looks shitty, lately. Why now and not before? Also, the “plywood” is a cheat that Enel put in some time ago”

  10. Jack Says:

    I’ve noticed that Enel has not kept up with removing debris and general upkeep of the dam. This allows the “Blogger in Chief” over at the “Blog of Record” to crow.

    If you want me to clarify, “plywood” is a cheat? Enel has, at some point replaced boards with plywood. When water rushes, the boards would roll off, over the top, as the pins bent. Plywood can’t do that.

    Of course, the pins, too, have been messed with. Folks have told me the pin spacing has been made closer and the pins made stronger. So, they don’t bend under the rushing water, as they should.

    Enel is not a good tenant.

  11. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    Having been in that area for decades I can tell you that plywood had been in use since at least the late 80’s. As for the debris what are you talking about? The debris that floats down river? Enel does remove that debris using a crane several times a year but they are certainly not going to send crews down on a daily basis to do it that is just totally unreasonable!

    I have seen photos of the cap stone on the top of the dam and the repeated use of pins over the past century+ has caused major damage. This solution (bladder) will ensure that further damage does not occur and will allow for better control of the river.

    As for Enel not being a good neighbor, no one is disputing that, how long did it take them to repair the bridge over the Francis Gate canal? No they are not a good neighbor, but it seems to me that since the dam is still an operating commercial enterprise and not an outdoor museum piece that this proposal is the best to preserve the dam, increase electrial output of the dam and protect property upstream from flooding.

    My $.02

  12. Jack Says:

    Except, the dam IS “an outdoor museum piece.”

    And it can still generate power and protect property. The increased power is not worth the value of detroying our history. My $0.02.

    You ever watch that show with the Pawn Brokers in Vegas? A thing, anything, is only worth what someone is willing to pay. Enel is bartering the power on a commodity market. They get what they get.

    Why pay with collateral that will be lost forever? It is not worth the price. It’s like burning the Whistler House to make room for a WalMart.

  13. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    All you took from that is it is not an outdoor museum piece?
    Nothing about preserving the dam from further destruction, nothing about the protection of property, nothing about the commercial aspect of the dam…the same commercial endeavours that changed the city from farmland in Dracut and Chelmsford into Lowell…so now we just box it up and put it on a shelf.

    If that is the case then why not remove it and allow the restoration of salmon and other anadromous fish species like is occuring in other rivers in New England…if you really want to restore things to the way they were….

  14. Jack Says:

    Whatever you say.

    Should we put up a Nuclear Power Plant, then? Sky is the limit?

  15. Eleanor Rigby Says:

    If the Nuclear Power Plant was “historical” would you be fighting as hard? Gotta go get onto the horse drawn trolley now for a trip downtown.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

[powered by WordPress.]

If you are not on Twitter and want to follow our feed on Facebook, click "Like" for our FB page.
BadgermillCity logo


Recent Posts