Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
Now that some of the dust has settled, I wanted to express my views on the events that occurred this past week. I am referring to GLTHS Mary Jo Santoro filing a police complaint on my LiL colleague Lynne. This is not how I wanted or expected to spend my Thanksgiving week but if you enter the public arena, you should be ready for unexpected and unpleasant events.
First and foremost, I want to share publicly what I said to both Lynne and Jack. In my opinion, Santoro’s actions were not aimed at Lynne but they were aimed at LiL in general and Jack in particular. It is Jack’s investigating writing under the banner of “Mary Jo Must Go” that has the Superintendent, her supporters, her benefactors, her sycophants, her entourage and most importantly the hanger-ons that live off the job clearinghouse, self-defined political power base on the Merrimack.
Yes, Santoro would not mind if Lynne was wounded but I believe that particular action was orchestrated by one of Santoro’s staunchest supporters for his own twisted motives. Jack’s post were the ultimate target. The decision to go after Lynne was an attempt by Santoro and her companions to intimidate LiL into silence. I do not think this threat has worked. Lynne and Jack are stubborn and committed. When your principles are based on ideas and not on getting a job in the public sector for yourself or a family member, it is pretty easy to continue to fight.
I have no idea where Santoro’s complaint will land in the legal arena. We will wait and see but at this rate, pretty soon she is going to run out of people to accuse of harassment. That tactic has short shelf life.
What bothered me the most in the past few days was the pleasure some bloggers took in the possibility that another blog will be shut off. I can understand the Lowell Sun jumping on that bandwagon, there is no love lost between us and them. But for bloggers to find pleasure in the possibility that free speech will be curtailed is truly disturbing.
The internet and all of its wonderful democratic components should be applauded by all self-described bloggers. We should celebrate the ability to exchange idea no matter how appalling we find the words and their delivery. The freedom to share views, debate, argue and perhaps form a consensus should be embraced. You should fight words with words, not with the threat of police action.
There are so many avenues that are available to express one’s views in Lowell, LiL is not the only game in town. There are many blogs (I do miss the Mill City boys) and most of those blogs do not share our views. Some even like to position themselves as the anti-LiL. We have a local radio station that welcomes callers; we have a local television show that provides a wide spectrum of views. And of course we have our newspaper. There are plenty of outlets for everyone to present their views. Why try to harm LiL?
And as far as Mr. Mike Hayden is concerned, I would like to offer a suggestion. Instead of being fascinated by Jack and Lynne, try to serve as a mentor to younger Lowellians who want to get involved in public service or civic activity. If you are so confident in your views, you should be able to quickly form a cadre of up and coming leaders who can challenge the current sentiments expressed by the majority of Lowell voters that have clearly stated “we want people like Fred Bahou and Erik Gitschier” to serve on the GLTHS Committee.” By the way, Mr. Hayden I really do not care what you may say about me so if you want to go on Gerry’s blog and call me vile names as you do Jack and Lynne, it will be a total waste of your time as well as the readers. I do not need nor seek your approval on any level.
I would like to thank Mary Jo. On behalf of three Lowell homeowners, taxpayers who like this City and want it to prosper on all levels, thanks for giving us a kick in the rear end and waking me up from my slumber.
[powered by WordPress.]
41 queries. 0.841 seconds
November 23rd, 2012 at 7:49 pm
Well said - Just one comment - “head on a platter” has been around since John the Baptist so , how anyone could that as a threat is beyond me. In my opinion, Ms Santoro does not like being criticized or being held to a certain professional standard. She might feel that threatening legal action will shut people up. If the Sun wanted to do a real expose , they might be surprised at the number of relatives and friends ( or their kids) connected to her.
November 23rd, 2012 at 8:37 pm
Mary Jo is a bully in no uncertain terms and she is doing what bullies do–when they are uncomfortable they ATTACK! Eric Gitschier has tried to hold her accountable so does she respond? No she ATTACKS! Fred Bahou has tried to hold her accountable–does she respond? no she ATTACKS! So it’s no surprise when Jack and Lynne expose her and the schools foibles she ATTACKS!
I have been to many sessions of the GLTHS School Committee meetings and watched others and of course have seen Mary Jo at those meetings both before and after her appointment as Supt. When she comes into the meeting room she does not walk–she swaggers! Anyone ever seen how a bully begins a confrontation? He SWAGGERS! Mary Jo doesn’t just answer a question she preaches as if her answer is the ONLY POSSIBLE answer and how dare anyone even ask the question never mind expect an answer.
I can only rue that Cliff Krieger was not the choice of the combined Lowell City Council/School Committee to replace Committeeman Lenzi. Knowing Cliff as I do he cannot be intimidated nor would he have been satisfied with a less-than-complete answer to any question asked of Mary Jo.
Jack has exposed the (wo)man behind the curtain who seems to be a combination of the Wicked Witch of the East and the Wicked Witch of the West. Lynne doesn’t have a “Toto” but Jack does have the heart, the brains and the courage to more than make up for the missing Wiz and Dorothy’s three companions. Follow the yellow brick road… Follow the yell….
November 23rd, 2012 at 9:33 pm
I do too have a Toto…they are Hector and Pauke. Though case in point I think Pauke rules the roost. Man is she pushy, particularly if food is involved. Well, hoisted on my own petard, my favorite bumper sticker on my old car (which I called the “driving blog”) was “Well behaved women rarely make history.”
Mimi, hats off, there are too many great lines here to quote just a few. Thanks.
I just came back from watching the new movie Lincoln, about a man who, even in the face of even his allies’ discomfort with black equality, accomplished their freedom from slavery. If the Mike Haydens and the Mary Jo Santoros think they can intimidate me into silence, or being nicer by failing to point out graft and abuse of the system, well, all I can say is I wear the “Queen of Mean” badge quite proudly. If being mean means holding people accountable, guilty as charged.
But can we change it to “Queen of Snark”? Cuz I think that fits better. My role model is really more Jon Stewart than Lucretia Borgia.
Hey, by elevating me to queen of anything, they really really give me a lot of importance. I wonder if they realize just how much they legitimize this blog with every overreach?
November 23rd, 2012 at 10:38 pm
It may seem odd, but I’m trying to imagine what it is like to be inside Santoro’s head right now. Certainly, this blog is causing her some serious agita. Is she sleeping well? Enjoying her work day? Or, is she scrambling to recover some semblance of a reputable legacy?
Let’s be realistic about this. Do we really need to run roughshod over the crooked crumbtrail, started by Cassin and his well leashed school committee? I want to. Big time. What purpose does it serve? And could slamming Santoro only resolve her to dig in? We may have data and the Sun’s archives pointing out the shame of Cassin’s kingdom. It wouldn’t be hard to make a tight case, based on logic, that any reasonable GLTHS School Committee person could conclude, Mary Jo Has Got To GO!
But there is a danger here. If we go at her full throttle, she will pivot into full martyr mode, the victim, not the antagonist. If The Sun pivots with her, then she can more easily herd the votes she needs to stay on. If I were her, I might just do that to piss off detractors.
Would The Sun really flip-flop on almost a decade of calling shenanigans on the crooked Cassin kingdom? In a word, yes. My trust in Campi was reliant on his own sense of self importance and self-righteousness. I figured he would flip flop because of pride. But, after reading this blurb by “Sun Staff,” I figure he is about to do a full Romney. There is a high probability, Campi will tip his cards in this Sunday’s Column.
As I mentioned before, the focus should turn towards helping Ray Boutin (Lowell) and Paul Morin (Dracut) see past the distractions and drama. Their contact info is here.
One other thing. The sad attempt to smear Tim Fallon means that he is viewed as a threat. The ability to put the past behind GLTHS and move on, may very well rest on Fallon. If the “civil war” out there can be simplified as Santoro vs. Fallon, then Santoro may be more willing to move on, if she knew (along with her clique) that Fallon would not try to follow in her place.
Peace and progress could very well lay in a simple agreement to find the next Superintendent from outside the district.
How do we encourage all involved to support pressing the reset button?
November 23rd, 2012 at 11:39 pm
I think that the GLTHS is a poisoned well and it’ll take an outsider at the helm, and many years, to clean it out for human consumption again.
GLTHS = Lowell City Government before Lynch took over.
November 24th, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Mimi
First of all I only say vile things about people who do the same to me, Although I disagree with most of what you say I do respect you. I have seen you on city life and you have never disrespected anyone that I have seen. I know you don’t need my approval nor do I need yours but respecting someone is different
November 24th, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Regional school district committees are a political entity, just as their municipal counterparts. The relationship of a regional superintendent to the school committee is the same as the municipal superintendent’s with the local school committee, and the city manager’s to the city council.
So, consider this. If someone were to say they should have the city manager’s head on a platter if he replaced the traffic signal at the Middlesex Street approach to the Rourke Bridge with a four-way stop, the resulting traffic chaos would lead many people to concur.
Part of the job description for a city manager or school superintendent is to work in an environment of public scrutiny. It includes sharp criticism for controversial actions or statements. Let’s hope this waste of law enforcement’s time on a specious complaint comes to a swift and uneventful conclusion, and police can return to more important calls - such as reports of unleashed cats.
November 24th, 2012 at 1:09 pm
First, I find it awesomely hilarious that Mike Hayden believes that two wrongs make a right, but believes himself a moral person. That’s perfect.
Second, I am even more amused by the fact that my simple quoting of his own words, his own website, and his own actions when he was an elected official (like voting to KEEP violating state education law and hence lose state funding, in order to keep the anti-illegal-children policy, when even his colleagues changed their minds) makes this so utterly sweet.
Mike Hayden is one of the most hateful commenters on this blog. He continues to be a hateful person in his online presence elsewhere as well. Respect is earned, sir.
November 24th, 2012 at 1:22 pm
Mimi
You see what I mean ???????????????
November 24th, 2012 at 2:00 pm
Mike, what specifically are you objecting to?
November 24th, 2012 at 2:26 pm
Wow, can’t take criticism can you? Feeling defensive? You should, you have a lot to defend.
My tone was utterly reasonable and actually, quite fact-based, including the part about you being hateful. Shall I quote your previous comments here? Or your utterly reprehensible comments on Nutter’s blog?
I’ll let you comments stand for themselves. Anyone can see they are hateful. Stop making my job so damn easy for me. Seriously.
November 24th, 2012 at 3:03 pm
The bold is mine. The embarrassment belongs to Mike Hayden.
xxxx
November 24th, 2012 at 3:12 pm
The signs thing in particular was always my biggest issue. (OK, probably 2nd biggest.) I can’t fathom looking at Spanish safety signage and thinking “There’s too much safety here for Spanish speakers.” Even in an anti-immigrant policy stance this makes no sense.
November 24th, 2012 at 5:19 pm
Trying to pull you back to the topic…. Does anybody think she’s setting herself up for a “stress-related” exit? She’’s been dropping breadcrumbs everywhere. Is there a tax advantage in collecting a disability retirement versus a normal retirement? You guys might just be playing right into her hands.
November 24th, 2012 at 5:36 pm
Well, if she did, PC, that would land her in the “Bon Bon Queen Hall of Fame.” Hayden would be so proud, if his precious MJ out “thugged” the union members he hates, so much.
November 24th, 2012 at 6:12 pm
If she is, I’m not sure how it helps her. Is there something in her contract where this would help her? Also, criticized on a blog as an excuse is pretty lame and would just confirm that she wasn’t the woman for the job in the first place, no?
November 25th, 2012 at 10:26 am
AMEN,Mimi.