Member of the reality-based community of progressive (not anonymous) Massachusetts blogs
In a previous post, I started a conversation about the news stories about downtown late-night incidents. The latest comment by a woman named Jane on this post ought to give the city and governmental bodies real pause:
I am so sad to read this blog and recent articles about downtown Lowell. My husband and I are getting ready to sell our home in the suburbs west of Boston. We fell in love with some of the lofts we have seen in Lowell, and have been trying to understand the city better, thinking we would enjoy living there. I just had not been able to piece together why downtown condos are not selling and don’t seem to be renting well, either, and at such relatively low prices. Now we are dropping the idea of even renting in downtown Lowell, given the nighttime activities. I don’t understand how it has come to this in a city that has come back in so many ways, has wonderful restaurants, theater, museums, galleries, etc. I hope all of you dedicated people will be able to work effectively with the city to turn this situation around.
Though I think perhaps there might be a mistake in assuming these incidents are the main reason downtown condos aren’t selling (condos, and housing in general, were in trouble long before this increased very-late-night activity, due to the housing bubble aftermath), I do think this comment is a wake-up call for the city to start paying attention to residents and address the issue quickly and firmly.
The fact that the License Commission seems to have taken on the attitude that they work for and with alcoholic establishments only, not abutting residents or other businesses affected by said establishments, is contributing to a fundamental problem for the city - both on a PR level, and on a physical safety and cleanliness level.
There are a lot of residents and other businesses in downtown. This is by design - the creation of downtown condos was the opening salvo in architecting the revival of the area. But revivals need constant maintenance. Self-examination about what sort of downtown we want to have, and by extension what sort of city we want to be, is so important to the process.
And we shouldn’t be making any plans to evict downtown’s residents. We’d be fools to do so, don’t you agree? A vital downtown depends on them. But that is where we are headed if we do not address the concerns of people like Jane, looking to relocate, but becoming uncomfortable about the direction of our fair city. Nor is it a good idea to dismiss the concerns of its existing residents when they say that the actions of this License Commission are not enough to stem the direction in which our downtown is heading. Not if we want to keep them.
We’re in the beginning stages of a bad cycle, and I commend the residents of downtown for not giving up on it, but instead for fighting, publicly when their complaints went unheeded by a dismissive regulatory board.
I still think many residents of downtown do not regret their choice. I know a lot of people downtown love their lifestyle there and are excited about the changes happening around them, for the most part. The tantalizing possibility of a trolley system, the creation of artist live-work studios in the beautiful new Appleton Mill building, the JAM plan. But having a vision of the future is not enough. We need to constantly evaluate and reevaluate the needs of the neighborhoods we already have.
What would you say to Jane? Those of you who live in downtown, what is your response? (And it should go without saying, keep it respectful.)
This one from a new transplant making his way in Lowell. Great photos and and interesting perspective on life in Lowell. Welcome, and I’ll add you to the sidebar.
(Hat tip to KRS.)
The Tanner St meeting last night was well attended with local residents, business owners, and interested Lowellians filling up the conference room and then some (there was a funny moment when Adam Baacke was talking about the elected officials in attendance, and he mentioned Mayor Murphy was there but out in the hallway because it was standing room only). Speaking of official attendance, besides our mayor, notables included Councilors Mendonca, Martin, and Lorry.
I’ll take this rather long post to after the flip: (more…)
Don’t forget, in a couple hours the Lowell DPD is hosting a Tanner St Economic Development Meeting, 6:00PM at the LRTA Building at 100 Hale Street. (original post here). I meant to post this up sooner but forgot.
Like Mitt Romney, apparently John MacDonald hasn’t met an issue he isn’t on both sides of…particularly when it comes Lowell’s Plan E form of government.
In the short time between finishing in 13th place in early November, and his declaration in the Lowell Sun this month, he’s done a sharp about-face with regards to whether Lowell should stick with Plan E, or go to a strong mayor format (a move he makes pretty clear in his Sun editorial is really anti-Mayor-Murphy, and, many believe, anti-Lynch).
Lowell Resident had the sharp eyes. He found the Sun’s election page for John MacDonald with a very particular question asked and answered:
10.Would an elected strong mayor form of government serve Lowell better than the present Plan E government setup giving the council the authority to hire a city manager?
No. I believe in the Plan E form of Government and believe in having a professional city manager handling the administration of the city. A Plan E Government is the best continued direction for Lowell.
John MacDonald now?
Over the past several elections, the Plan E from of government appears to be failing to reflect the will of the electorate in Lowell …
Perhaps it’s time for a real mayor with clout and power to run the city, and not just a ceremonial mayor who is judged by how many festivals and flag raisings he or she attends? Perhaps it’s time for the city of Lowell to elect its head administrator? Perhaps it’s time for the city of Lowell to enjoy the respect that comes from an electing a mayor?
I do believe it is time to explore a Mayor-Council form of government for Lowell.
As Lowell Resident said…what changed? I think we know the answer to that.
Update: and the weirdness gets weirder. What does John MacDonald’s definition of “have felt for some time”? I guess it depends what your definition of is, is…
Watch live video from ltc-public 1 on Justin.tv
I thought, you know maybe it was time, I felt that - and have felt for some time - that, maybe it was time for Lowell to change its form of government to a strong mayor/council.
It’s not an exaggeration to say that no web content maker on the internet should NOT be in total fear of SOPA. (Edit: I meant no web content maker should NOT be in fear…) I knew it was bad, but BoingBoing put it into real perspective:
Boing Boing could never co-exist with a SOPA world: we could not ever link to another website unless we were sure that no links to anything that infringes copyright appeared on that site. So in order to link to a URL on LiveJournal or WordPress or Twitter or Blogspot, we’d have to first confirm that no one had ever made an infringing link, anywhere on that site. Making one link would require checking millions (even tens of millions) of pages, just to be sure that we weren’t in some way impinging on the ability of five Hollywood studios, four multinational record labels, and six global publishers to maximize their profits.
If we failed to take this precaution, our finances could be frozen, our ad broker forced to pull ads from our site, and depending on which version of the bill goes to the vote, our domains confiscated, and, because our server is in Canada, our IP address would be added to a US-wide blacklist that every ISP in the country would be required to censor.
So LeftinLowell is going to join the one-day blackout tomorrow, Jan 18th, from 8am to 8pm. Lest we go dark permanently under a SOPA world. If you have a website, you might want to consider the simple steps that the website gives you to do so - a simple javascript that goes into your head tag.
I’m in a back and forth on the Lowell Downtown Neighborhood Association’s Facebook page because yet another late-night alcohol-induced incident sent a young man to the hospital with stab wounds this weekend. To quote Kelly F from that conversation:
On Middle Street in the empty bank parking lot, I’ve seen a stabbing, a person being intentionally run over after an argument, a hundred fights, people screaming at the top of their lungs for an hour either fighting or just out of their minds drunk - ALL ALCOHOL FUELED at 2am coming from the same bars we know are problematic and over-serve alcohol to these kids and then I get to see them in this condition get into their CARS and DRIVE!
This doesn’t seem to be an isolated incident, and it appears to be worsening, or at the least, not getting better.
Now, I am all for alcoholic-serving restaurants and (some) bars being downtown. They are a staple of a thriving urban district, and bring money into the area. However, there has got to be a better way to handle this, then sending ambulances to clean up the mess. And by all accounts, the police are doing their jobs as best they can, sending extra patrols and clearing people out after the bars. Costing the city thousands of taxpayer dollars more.
It is plain to see that this is a policy problem, not a policing one.
Meanwhile, we have the goddamned liquor licensing Commission Chairman Walter Bayliss telling us taxpayers and residents are not as important as bar owners despite the fact that a lot of people (particularly residents) are simply asking for after-work-hour meetings, and Commissioner Brian Akashian attacking Mayor Murphy for daring to make a November motion to move the meetings and accomodate residents who actually work for a living and can’t make the 3:30 meeting time. Akashian on Murphy:
This is his history as a city councilor. …He continuously makes motions that are for his own benefit and never takes into account anyone it affects.”
Downtown resident and blogger kad barma has a lot of background on the hapless, tone-deaf License Commission in this excellent post if you have not read it. (He also has another very recent post about the after-Saturday-night carnage. Yum.) Here is the LDNA (Downtown Neighborhood Association) take on it.
kad barma writes:
the license commission has almost always, and i mean almost ALWAYS sided with the liquor stores and bars, and when they did choose to act, only handed out token and wholly ineffective “sanctions” which hardly ever caused these businesses to pause in their profligacy.
…
so where is the license commission on all of this? they are trash talking downtown residents for being complainers without the commitment to show up at their 3:30pm afternoon meetings, and then foot-dragging to the point of obfuscational jawboning about possible legal action to stop their meeting times being directed by the city council to the evenings. (none of which is possible because they have no leg to stand on to resist, so meeting times will indeed be changed). commission chair walter bayliss has tried to blow smokescreens about costs, (the police overtime argument being the funniest–the cops who need to testify are on nights, and actually it potentially costs MORE to send them to afternoon meetings than evening ones, but lets not digress), and gotten on his soapbox to bloviate an incredible quantity of nonsense without substance or point whatsoever. he’s been cornered, FINALLY, to follow open meeting law requirements to post agendas 48 hours in advance as had never been previously done, and he’s finally being shown to be the out-of-touch anachronism and impediment to progress that he so surely is. (the other commission members are better, but not as yet taking action to use their majority to do more right things).
You should also read this comment by kmarcin, which ends:
…Both Mr. Bayliss and Mr. Weiker stated at the last meeting that they work for the businesses because they pay a higher tax rate. If city boards weight who they work for by their tax bill then there is not a single one that is working for me…I do not think the tax bill I pay for my small but opulent 856sf. compares to that being paid by any business.
I am just expecting too much?
Apparently.
So, let’s recap, shall we? We have a burgeoning (and very expensive, in police overtime) problem with lawlessness downtown in the wee sma’s when the bars all let loose their puking and belligerent diehards. We have a police force that, despite the tight city budgets, is now having to send extra people to the streets of downtown to sweep up after the problem…a problem they can mostly only react to, but too hard a problem for them to solve on their own. We have many, many people complaining that the License Commissioners belittle residents at meetings, refuse to accommodate them with a simple meeting change because hey, the bar owners pay a bigger tax rate and are more important, right? They give out meaningless and toothless sanctions to bars which violate some pretty serious ordinances and laws (like underage drinking). Mr. Bayliss considers downtown a “business district” despite the sheer number of residents that call it home.
Do any of us think that weekly news stories of stabbings and injuries and worse is going to do Lowell any goddamned good, businesses or residents??
Does this help Lowell’s delicate reputation as an up-and-coming city with a lot of great venues, art, music, theatre, and food?
Every one of these Commissioners, Bayliss, Weicker, and Akashian, have demonstrated a lack of ability to handle their positions - their statements are so out of touch with not only what the residents of downtown want, but also what this city needs, that every. Single. One of them. Has got TO GO.
Of course, they are appointed for a certain term. I am sure that at least one or two of them are not up for quite a while yet. This poses a problem.
Is there an impeachment process or something similar that we can invoke here?
Or are we waiting for the next stabbing victim to die instead, and watch the entire region rolls its eyes and say, “Well, that’s Lowell for you. Scary place. Wouldn’t want to live, work, or visit there…”?
You think that one of the city’s oldest blogs doing this will help Lowell’s reputation? No? Then to those in power to do something, DO IT. Before something terrible happens.
If you read my November blog post A Recycling Adventure, then you know all about Lowell’s local business, Northeast Material Handling, where you can bring electronics and other items for disposal and recycling. Well, starting tomorrow, and every second Saturday of the month going forward between 8am and noon:
NorthEast Material Handling (38 Prince Ave) will host a Recycling Drop-Off event
Residents (especially those without City ‘curbside’ services) can bring “EVERYTHING WITH CORD”.
Most items have very nominal drop-off charges. NO Furniture… ie mattress/boxe spring /couch.
Visit http://www.RecycleLowell.com for more details!
Got clutter? Been waiting to figure out what to do with your electronic waste? Now you know you can get rid of it properly and that it will be fully recycled!
The Lowell Sun is reporting that Armand Mercier, former City Councilor and Mayor, has passed away. He was serving as Mayor at the time that I moved to Lowell and started to become active locally, so I will always remember that.
We disagreed on a lot of things but he always treated me with respect. He told me a number of times when I encountered him in person, “We don’t agree, but keep on doing what you’re doing.” He could be classy that way.
My condolences to his family and friends for their loss.
As mentioned in comments of the previous post on Veterans for Peace staging an “eat-in” at Babylon restaurant, Rachel Maddow of The Rachel Maddow Show signed off tonight with a short piece on the vandalism incident, the yummy “occupation,” the restaurant, and its owner. It was a lovely moment of non-political feel-good news and, as usual, Rachel was up to date on her facts and packed a lot of information into the clip, which you can watch below.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Plus you can play “Where’s Cliff” and spot my fellow blogger in one of the photos flashing by during the story. (The photos are from Babylon’s Facebook page.) I will tell you though that Cliff is NOT wearing a red-and-white stripped hat. (OK, hilarious, after I posted this and viewed the post to be sure the player loaded, the preview image that the player show IS Cliff. See? Told you he was famous now!)
Cliff, you’re famous among liberals now! I know you’ve gotta be really proud of that. Even newly minted Mayor Patrick didn’t make it onto the show despite several photos of him in the FB gallery from last night.
And thanks to Veterans for Peace for leading the way and showing our city in such a great light!
[powered by WordPress.]
58 queries. 0.594 seconds